|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379799 is a reply to message #379725] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 13:05   |
_SSnipe_
Messages: 4121
Registered: May 2007
Location: Riverside Southern Califo...
Karma: 0
|
General (4 Stars) |
|
|
|
This is funny, He got caught, and has back up and proof, Id be more happier if we knew more of his nicks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379815 is a reply to message #379725] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 14:56 |
rebdog
Messages: 17
Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
ok i think this is complete bullshit, so what he used *cheat name removed*while taking some screenshots.
Like 75% of you havnt tried it on multilayer practice, just to see what it can do. 6 months or so ago i got my mate to join a server which i made with a password, so i could see what it does to learn from it. From learning what it does ive caught alot of people using it. I even tried using DH hacks on my own server to test if biatch was working. I dont see the big deal tbh. Do half you which are mods ban for evidence on other servers, no you dont. So go ban me too
[Updated on: Sun, 12 April 2009 14:57] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379819 is a reply to message #379726] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 15:49 |
raven
Messages: 595
Registered: January 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Goztow wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 09:52 |
IP: 69.211.140.178
<Goztow> !hip 69.211.140.178
-TK2-BIbot- Found 1 results for your search, showing first 1...
-TK2-BIbot- 69.211.140.178: ( Queen (12/04/09) )
And just in case he removes his screeny: attached.
Cheaters are idiots (top left corner).
|
Queen: 5bee4ba17d69645de66f5dd955263f6f
Queen: 69.213.184.203, 69.218.201.40, 69.218.227.91, 69.218.202.203, 68.250.187.179, 69.208.54.215, 69.218.209.7, 69.218.234.110, 69.218.234.27, 69.218.216.22, 69.211.142.77, 69.218.202.227, 69.212.83.31, 69.218.213.129
Queen: *.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net
-Jelly Administrator
-Exodus Administrator
[Updated on: Sun, 12 April 2009 15:50] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379824 is a reply to message #379823] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 16:20 |
 |
Goobers
Messages: 39
Registered: April 2009
Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| NZ wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 18:12 |
From Queen i have seen nothing not even as small as a lag kill from him in game and his KD has never pointed towards being a cheater,Justification in banning a player whom posts an SS while not in your server is not justified proof, And would how ever be disappointing to see this happen at this point.
This is not me sticking up for him it is my observation of him over the past 6 months while in game playing along side of him.
NZ
|
| rebdog wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 16:56 |
ok i think this is complete bullshit, so what he used *cheat name removed*while taking some screenshots.
Like 75% of you havnt tried it on multilayer practice, just to see what it can do. 6 months or so ago i got my mate to join a server which i made with a password, so i could see what it does to learn from it. From learning what it does ive caught alot of people using it. I even tried using DH hacks on my own server to test if biatch was working. I dont see the big deal tbh. Do half you which are mods ban for evidence on other servers, no you dont. So go ban me too
|
agreed, ive played with queen for 5months+ on several different servers, never seen or suspected anything suspicious and have had no complaints reported to me about queen by any ingame player, so what he appears to have *cheat name removed*on his computer tell me you dont, WHERES YOUR INGAME ONLINE PROOF, ill tell you were it is you dont fucking have any, good to see queens mistake has given you idiots something to talk about, but there's no way using *cheat name removed*on a private lan game is a bannable offense for online servers, do some real detective work find him cheating ingame of shut the fuck up
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379832 is a reply to message #379824] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 17:49 |
 |
DutchNeon
Messages: 533
Registered: January 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Goobers wrote on Mon, 13 April 2009 01:20 |
| NZ wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 18:12 |
From Queen i have seen nothing not even as small as a lag kill from him in game and his KD has never pointed towards being a cheater,Justification in banning a player whom posts an SS while not in your server is not justified proof, And would how ever be disappointing to see this happen at this point.
This is not me sticking up for him it is my observation of him over the past 6 months while in game playing along side of him.
NZ
|
| rebdog wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 16:56 |
ok i think this is complete bullshit, so what he used *cheat name removed*while taking some screenshots.
Like 75% of you havnt tried it on multilayer practice, just to see what it can do. 6 months or so ago i got my mate to join a server which i made with a password, so i could see what it does to learn from it. From learning what it does ive caught alot of people using it. I even tried using DH hacks on my own server to test if biatch was working. I dont see the big deal tbh. Do half you which are mods ban for evidence on other servers, no you dont. So go ban me too
|
agreed, ive played with queen for 5months+ on several different servers, never seen or suspected anything suspicious and have had no complaints reported to me about queen by any ingame player, so what he appears to have *cheat name removed*on his computer tell me you dont, WHERES YOUR INGAME ONLINE PROOF, ill tell you were it is you dont fucking have any, good to see queens mistake has given you idiots something to talk about, but there's no way using *cheat name removed*on a private lan game is a bannable offense for online servers, do some real detective work find him cheating ingame of shut the fuck up
|
Seriously,
If you are running *cheat name removed* in a LAN game to take screenshots (with no1 else in it), it means you are utterly retarded, OR you run it everytime when starting up Ren (habit), OR you used *cheat name removed* in a public game, then switched over to a LAN game without quiting Ren.
Now give me VALID reason why you need to run *cheat name removed* in a LAN game, WITHOUT any other players. WITHOUT any others players, it has NO use testing a cheat.
This proof is enough proof to conclude him as a cheater.
@Nz,
Cheaters can also play smart while running cheating. The ppl who obviously use cheats will often get banned, but there are also ppl who safely use cheats, without getting banned.
[Updated on: Sun, 12 April 2009 18:00] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379833 is a reply to message #379725] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 17:58 |
Gohax
Messages: 738
Registered: January 2009
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Eh sorry to say but I'm leaning to him cheating. ^said summed up just about everything. Why load up rg h in a lan game with absolutely nobody in the game?
And if I'm not mistaken, all of your screenshots for your skins have been taken with that name. I seriously doubt that's someone else if they have all been taken with that name :/
 | Quote: |
·OTBot·Gohax killed beerfull4 (Black Hand Sniper/Sniper Rifle Vs. Deadeye/Sniper Rifle).
·OTBot·beerfull4: see that for sure a auto aim
·OTBot·beerfull4: u know how i can tell
·OTBot·Gohax: LOL
·OTBot·Gohax: how can you tell?
·OTBot·beerfull4: becuz your american and americans are like that
·OTBot·Gohax: LOL!
·OTBot·beerfull4 has left the game.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379834 is a reply to message #379725] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 18:14 |
 |
slosha
Messages: 1540
Registered: September 2008
Location: North Dakota FTW
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
notice he's completely silent in this topic now
The road I cruise is a bitch now, baby.
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379835 is a reply to message #379834] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 18:17 |
 |
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637
Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Nobody gives a flying damn if he is using RGfuckingH on a LAN game or not...fact is the cheat is on his computer and what makes you idiots think he would not use it online? Why give ANYONE with a cheat the benefit of the doubt?
Oh that's right...you are sticking up for your man! GOOD JOB!
| NZ wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 18:12 |
Justification in banning a player whom posts an SS while not in your server is not justified proof,
|
Actually it makes it much easier to find cheaters. A murderer who killed in Europe is still a murderer anywhere else on the globe. What you are saying is we have to find him killing someone else outside of Europe to arrest him. Now that's what I call simmering horseshit.
| Goobers wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 18:20 |
agreed, ive played with queen for 5months+ on several different servers, never seen or suspected anything suspicious and have had no complaints reported to me about queen by any ingame player, so what he appears to have *cheat name removed*on his computer tell me you dont, WHERES YOUR INGAME ONLINE PROOF, ill tell you were it is you dont fucking have any, good to see queens mistake has given you idiots something to talk about, but there's no way using *cheat name removed*on a private lan game is a bannable offense for online servers, do some real detective work find him cheating ingame of shut the fuck up
|
mistake? So are you indirectly saying he should have been more careful before posting these screenshots?
lmao you guys are hilarious! 
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379836 is a reply to message #379725] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 18:18 |
|
slosha
Messages: 1540
Registered: September 2008
Location: North Dakota FTW
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
also, if you havn't noticed the only people saying they've played with him have 1 post.
The road I cruise is a bitch now, baby.
[Updated on: Sun, 12 April 2009 18:18] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [skins] [message #379840 is a reply to message #379812] |
Sun, 12 April 2009 18:38 |
anant
Messages: 571
Registered: July 2008
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Darkknight wrote on Sun, 12 April 2009 16:45 |
Well queen I'd love to believe you but why would you let someone else take your screen shots? Why not just do it yourself? And if your not dell, please tell us who that is so they can be banned for using RGH
|
Mabye he did not have a SS program (fraps or something)
so he had to send it to somebody
Rest in peace spoonplex, We love you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
. Right 
.
