|
Re: Will you be buying Generals 2? [message #367867 is a reply to message #367788] |
Sun, 18 January 2009 23:21 |
bisen11
Messages: 797 Registered: December 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
I probably won't get it, especially not at $50. I didn't care much for the first. It was interesting enough to play through the campaign but didn't have much in the form of replay value for me. Maybe if it ever drops to $10 I'll get it someday.
|
|
|
Re: Will you be buying Generals 2? [message #367872 is a reply to message #367851] |
Mon, 19 January 2009 00:06 |
|
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836 Registered: March 2005 Location: New York
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
@ Tanky:
What are you talking about? You are the only one forcing your opinion here to be fact. All I'm doing is using points other people make as reminders for something I liked/disliked about the game.
Your OPINION isn't FACT.
TANKY wrote on Sun, 18 January 2009 23:50 | But you repetedly keep posting saying how horrible and bad Generals is in every topic discussing it in a tone AS IF Generals is in fact really bad...
|
Yes, because it IS in fact really bad. That's my educated opinion.* Also, tone? What tone? This is the internet. I'm, to you, just text on a monitor. What ever tone you are receiving is the tone you want me to have. You might be thinking my tone, when saying this, is out of anger or a need for you to see things my way, but in fact I'm actually laughing at how stupid this argument is and at how seriously you seem to be taking it.. (your 'tone' from my perspective)
TANKY wrote on Sun, 18 January 2009 23:50 | ...while it is NOT.
|
That's your opinion. Just because you have a different opinion than me, doesn't make you right. Just as it doesn't make me right either.
TANKY wrote on Sun, 18 January 2009 23:50 | In absolute unbiased reality and standard, Generals is a good game with many many favorable ratings and reviews.
|
Again, opinion isn't fact. In fact, to the contrary of what you said, you are the only one of us (both of us) that has the bias opinion. I've clearly stated already the reasons why I don't like the game and have also clearly stated that although I don't like the game it is a C&C game.
I'm not saying Generals is a bad C&C game, no. It's just a bad game in general (no pun intended). Or, to put it another way, if C&C Generals wasn't a C&C game and just "Generals" then I would have the exact same opinion, than I do now. How is that being bias?
Just because you don't agree with my opinion doesn't make me bias.
*educated opinion: an opinion not developed through ignorance. A state of mind and opinion developed through trial and error. (In this case, an opinion developed after playing the game in detail)
[Updated on: Mon, 19 January 2009 00:22] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Will you be buying Generals 2? [message #367882 is a reply to message #367815] |
Mon, 19 January 2009 00:41 |
|
Goztow
Messages: 9743 Registered: March 2005 Location: Belgium
Karma: 14
|
General (5 Stars) Goztoe |
|
|
[NE | Fobby[GEN] wrote on Mon, 19 January 2009 00:52]I think the only reason why I had played Generals was because there were no other C&C games released between 2003 and 2006 (we saw C&C 3 in 2007). It's a very mediocre game at best, so no, I will not be trying Generals 2.
|
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|
Re: Will you be buying Generals 2? [message #367910 is a reply to message #367872] |
Mon, 19 January 2009 07:17 |
pawky
Messages: 115 Registered: December 2008
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 19 January 2009 01:06 | @ Tanky:
What are you talking about? You are the only one forcing your opinion here to be fact. All I'm doing is using points other people make as reminders for something I liked/disliked about the game.
Your OPINION isn't FACT.
|
Of course not and I don't mean it that way. Funny thing is my opinion reflects the vast majority of professional game reviewers AND gamers who deemed the game just fine and gave it high ratings based on a standard ratings grid.
And generally saying, as far as C&C, I feel bad for those who hate the game because it has dozers, has no MCV, because they feel it is a rip-off and due to the different HUD and it having the "C&C" title...big lols really.
[Updated on: Mon, 19 January 2009 08:39] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Will you be buying Generals 2? [message #368213 is a reply to message #367788] |
Wed, 21 January 2009 02:52 |
|
I am not getting it for £35-40. I'll wait until it goes to the bargain bucket for about £10.
I don't think Generals should have had the C&C logo (oh no, flamebait) on it. The whole style of gameplay was different: no turtling (effective turtling, anyway) forcing a fast build and rush style, which was not the ONLY option during earlier C&C's, and I like good story campaigns. (Generals not having one...)
That latter point is also why I am quite dissapointed with Sins Of A Solar Empire, as that has loads of backstory references in the manual (which I read as it installed) but then no campaign!
Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
BBC news, quoting... |
Supporters of Proposition 8 will argue California does not discriminate against gays, as the current law allows them to get married - as long as they wed a partner of the opposite sex.
|
halokid wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 08:46 |
R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 15:35 |
|
the hell is that?
|
|
|
|
|