Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » RenHawk Source
Re: RenHawk Source [message #365743 is a reply to message #365705] Fri, 02 January 2009 08:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
halo2pac is currently offline  halo2pac
Messages: 659
Registered: December 2006
Location: Near Cleveland, Ohio
Karma: 0
Colonel
My turn on the defensive, thank you.

genetix wrote on Thu, 01 January 2009 23:20


I can't wait! Oh, right it would be faster for me to go to the online demo, save the file and decompile it myself...


I do not see you taking the initiative to do anything related to the renhawk source, so if you were remotely smart you would have gotten off your fat ass and did something about it by now.

Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1991/nefobbygenyunoreleasere.jpg
Rene-Buddy | Renegade X
Join the fight against Obsessive-Compulsive Posting Disorder. Cancel is ur friend.
*Renegade X Dev Team Member*
Re: RenHawk Source [message #365746 is a reply to message #365738] Fri, 02 January 2009 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 15:38


Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 12:28


It's not the original source, though, and worthless.

Re: RenHawk Source [message #365757 is a reply to message #365746] Fri, 02 January 2009 12:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
genetix is currently offline  genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
Commander
RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 10:22

halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 15:38


Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 12:28


It's not the original source, though, and worthless.




Exactly my point. This is a waste of time.

Anyone smart enough to use the decompiled source would have done it themselves and used it privately! There's nothing else to it!

halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 09:38

I do not see you taking the initiative to do anything related to the renhawk source, so if you were remotely smart you would have gotten off your fat ass and did something about it by now.


hmm... No I will not get off my skinny athletic ass because I work from home. I actually get paid to do work sitting on my laptop in bed. So no I will not get off my ass and stop working.

I wouldn't bother trying to "post the renhawk source" in the first place. I'm smart enough to recognize that there's no point. There people here who replied saying YES POST IT!!!! are a bunch of n00bs that expect you to present them with a working copy.


[Updated on: Fri, 02 January 2009 12:22]

Report message to a moderator

Re: RenHawk Source [message #365760 is a reply to message #365757] Fri, 02 January 2009 13:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jnz is currently offline  jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 19:21

RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 10:22

halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 15:38


Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 12:28


It's not the original source, though, and worthless.




Exactly my point. This is a waste of time.





I was not agreeing with you. Your whole argument is quite silly, and your attitude stinks.
Re: RenHawk Source [message #365762 is a reply to message #365760] Fri, 02 January 2009 13:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
genetix is currently offline  genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
Commander
RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:04

genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 19:21

RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 10:22

halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 15:38


Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 12:28


It's not the original source, though, and worthless.




Exactly my point. This is a waste of time.





I was not agreeing with you. Your whole argument is quite silly, and your attitude stinks.


You still help prove my point though. So thank-you.


Re: RenHawk Source [message #365764 is a reply to message #365762] Fri, 02 January 2009 13:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dr3w2 is currently offline  dr3w2
Messages: 485
Registered: September 2006
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
Commander
genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:11

RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:04

genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 19:21

RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 10:22

halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 15:38


Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 12:28


It's not the original source, though, and worthless.




Exactly my point. This is a waste of time.





I was not agreeing with you. Your whole argument is quite silly, and your attitude stinks.


You still help prove my point though. So thank-you.


lol So try and prove a point that your not a tool, your argument is not silly, and that your attitude does not stink then maybe you'll be in-tune to what were saying to you.


n00bstories Server Administrator
Re: RenHawk Source [message #365767 is a reply to message #365764] Fri, 02 January 2009 13:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
genetix is currently offline  genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
Commander
andr3w282 wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:21

genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:11

RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:04

genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 19:21

RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 10:22

halo2pac wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 15:38


Dan, when you decompile a swf you get a basic working copy. Not the original. I wish he would have left the source, but since he didn't this comes close. Its a nice substitute, and gives a good jist of what he did.


RoShamBo wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 12:28


It's not the original source, though, and worthless.




Exactly my point. This is a waste of time.





I was not agreeing with you. Your whole argument is quite silly, and your attitude stinks.


You still help prove my point though. So thank-you.


lol So try and prove a point that your not a tool, your argument is not silly, and that your attitude does not stink then maybe you'll be in-tune to what were saying to you.


You can think whatever you want. Not to sound like a complete ass hole but by speaking your mind you have to assume I actually care.

I've read way to much worthless crap on this forum. I don't really care anymore.


Re: RenHawk Source [message #365789 is a reply to message #365357] Fri, 02 January 2009 17:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ethenal is currently offline  Ethenal
Messages: 2532
Registered: January 2007
Location: US of A
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)

gay





But seriously, shouldn't he deserve some credit for at least doing something?


-TLS-DJ-EYE-K wrote on Mon, 18 March 2013 07:29

Instead of showing us that u aren't more inteligent than a Toast, maybe you should start becomming good in renegade Thumbs Up

[Updated on: Fri, 02 January 2009 17:45]

Report message to a moderator

Re: RenHawk Source [message #365853 is a reply to message #365767] Sat, 03 January 2009 11:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nikki6ixx is currently offline  nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:29


You can think whatever you want. Not to sound like a complete ass hole but by speaking your mind you have to assume I actually care.

I've read way to much worthless crap on this forum. I don't really care anymore.


You obviously do since you're still in here. Mr. Green

And who gives a shit, seriously? Why bother arguing about this; if the OP successfully decomposes, decompiles, decompoops, whatever, the code, then we can all be happy happy, joy joy. If he doesn't do it properly, well then just say 'LOLTOLDUSO' and be done with it.


Renegade:
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
Re: RenHawk Source [message #365882 is a reply to message #365853] Sat, 03 January 2009 17:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
halo2pac is currently offline  halo2pac
Messages: 659
Registered: December 2006
Location: Near Cleveland, Ohio
Karma: 0
Colonel
nikki6ixx wrote on Sat, 03 January 2009 12:41

You obviously do since you're still in here. Mr. Green

And who gives a shit, seriously? Why bother arguing about this; if the OP successfully decomposes, decompiles, decompoops, whatever, the code, then we can all be happy happy, joy joy. If he doesn't do it properly, well then just say 'LOLTOLDUSO' and be done with it.



http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1991/nefobbygenyunoreleasere.jpg
Rene-Buddy | Renegade X
Join the fight against Obsessive-Compulsive Posting Disorder. Cancel is ur friend.
*Renegade X Dev Team Member*
Re: RenHawk Source [message #365884 is a reply to message #365853] Sat, 03 January 2009 18:22 Go to previous message
genetix is currently offline  genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
Commander
nikki6ixx wrote on Sat, 03 January 2009 12:41

genetix wrote on Fri, 02 January 2009 14:29


You can think whatever you want. Not to sound like a complete ass hole but by speaking your mind you have to assume I actually care.

I've read way to much worthless crap on this forum. I don't really care anymore.


You obviously do since you're still in here. Mr. Green

And who gives a shit, seriously? Why bother arguing about this; if the OP successfully decomposes, decompiles, decompoops, whatever, the code, then we can all be happy happy, joy joy. If he doesn't do it properly, well then just say 'LOLTOLDUSO' and be done with it.


I don't give a shit about what he has to say about me. I'm enjoying this post and thats why I'm still here.


Previous Topic: Terminator 4!
Next Topic: New community
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 24 20:20:34 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00949 seconds