Re: GLOBAL WARMING [message #338075 is a reply to message #337251] |
Sun, 29 June 2008 11:33   |
 |
Ryu
Messages: 2833 Registered: September 2006 Location: Liverpool, England.
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |

|
|
THIS TOPIC IS ABOUT A NATURAL EARTH PROCESS, NOT GOD.
BOTH OF YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP AND STAY ON TOPIC PLEASE.
Thanks.
Edit: Page 4.
Presence is a curious thing, if you think you need to prove it... you probably never had it in the first place.
[Updated on: Sun, 29 June 2008 11:33] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: GLOBAL WARMING [message #338080 is a reply to message #337251] |
Sun, 29 June 2008 11:41   |
 |
GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605 Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Fuck, even in the Bible, I don't really recall mentions of dinosaurs.
I should probably read through it again to be sure, but yeah...
Toggle SpoilerScrin wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22 |
cAmpa wrote on Sat, 24 January 2009 12:45 | Scrin, stop pming people to get the building bars.
|
FUCK YOU AND THIS SHIT GAME WITH YOUR SCRIPTS!!! I HAVE ASKING YOU AND ANOTHER NOOBS HERE ABOUT HELP WITH THAT BUILDING ICONS FEATURES FOR YEARS, BUT YOU KEEP IGNORING ME AND KEEP WRITE SHIT, SO BURN YOU AND YOUR ASSLICKERS FRIENDS, THIS TIME I'M NOT COME BACK!!!!!!!!!
|
[Updated on: Sun, 29 June 2008 11:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: GLOBAL WARMING [message #338146 is a reply to message #338141] |
Sun, 29 June 2008 20:23   |
 |
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637 Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
@ cheesesoda:
Going back to what I said and your response, you see, that is not what I meant. You see when a animal falls down dead, it's remains get eaten by insects and then rots away...even the bones. It does not fossilize.
But in the remains of the dinosaurs, we only find fossils of them. A fossil is made when the animal is completely covered in mud after which the minerals in the mud and sediment replaces the tissue and other soft parts of the dead animal. It will take massive amounts of mud and sediment to cover large dinosaurs...and yet they are found this way.
Holding that thought, refer to this page very quickly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluge_%28mythology%29
Funny how it is conveniently branded as "mythology"...myths covering and spanning across several cultures independent of each other just are not made up all of a sudden.
Today, when crap happens, Hollywood makes a movie. It was no different in the ancient times...they wrote it down and told stories. There is no denying that a massive flood took place. It is quite rational to believe that it was this flood that wiped out the bigger life-forms such as dinosaurs.
Heck, I am not even using the Bible here! The media conveniently always presents the Bible as the sole source of all flood related stories while it misrepresents the flood stories of many different cultures. This is done to both undermine the flood story (and it's threat to evolutionary chain) and the Christian religion also. It is completely possible that groups of humanity survived the flood...again, it DOES NOT have to be Noah on his Ark. You can even rationalize that they took many animals with them...to eat and feed.
How the flood happened? We don't know...could be rain, or a asteroid impact on the oceans. Think about the massive mudslides and shifts of sediment.
If a meteor hit and the resulting dust clouds choked off the dinosaurs, we would'nt be finding that MANY dinosaur "fossils"...they would have rot away. But we can most certainly rationalize that some did get preserved but not in the amounts we see now. You need those 65 million years for it to work.
The funny thing about evolution is that dogs are allowed to have different species (breeds) but when it comes to upright walking bipeds, it is automatically branded as a continuation of a evolving group of mammals! There WERE different species of man...Neanderthals and Cro Magnon...and there were many more kinds. It is highly unlikely that it was part of a evolutionary chain of homo sapiens.
I have high respect for those who are smarter than me but I also understand the fragility of the human mind. Science is nothing but a record of the organized discoveries of man...discoveries of objects and phenomonen that were/are already there but left only to be found and "intelluctually catalogued" and added to the knowledge base of a arrogant sentient species.
NOTE: I edited my post changing minor sentences. Sorry for inconvenience.
EDIT FINAL: Fixed errors...no more edits. Apologies.
[Updated on: Sun, 29 June 2008 20:36] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: GLOBAL WARMING [message #339616 is a reply to message #338080] |
Mon, 07 July 2008 22:25   |
 |
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637 Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 29 June 2008 13:41 | Fuck, even in the Bible, I don't really recall mentions of dinosaurs.
I should probably read through it again to be sure, but yeah...
|
So if chickens are not mentioned in the Bible...then...yeah...lololololol
[Updated on: Mon, 07 July 2008 22:26] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: GLOBAL WARMING [message #341462 is a reply to message #337251] |
Thu, 17 July 2008 16:08   |
kikiller
Messages: 21 Registered: August 2006
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
I believe its a natural cycle, I beleive in climate change not global warming, Just look whats happening right now we are breaking the records in temps that were set like 100 years ago..
|
|
|
Re: GLOBAL WARMING [message #341691 is a reply to message #339616] |
Fri, 18 July 2008 21:06  |
Rocko
Messages: 833 Registered: January 2007 Location: Long Beach, California
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
pawkyfox wrote on Tue, 08 July 2008 00:25 |
Cabal8616 wrote on Sun, 29 June 2008 13:41 | Fuck, even in the Bible, I don't really recall mentions of dinosaurs.
I should probably read through it again to be sure, but yeah...
|
So if chickens are not mentioned in the Bible...then...yeah...lololololol
|
watever go have sex with a fox
black and proud
|
|
|