|
|
|
|
|
|
| Souper [message #25215] |
Mon, 16 June 2003 12:50   |
Azndemon989
Messages: 12
Registered: June 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
|
If you had to choose between saving the barracks or the weapons factory, then you better save the barracks. Unless you are playing against complete losers..you better save the barracks. You can wipe out an army of tanks with half as many Syndies (Personal ion cannon) or Ravashaws. Piece o' cake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #25305] |
Mon, 16 June 2003 16:43 |
 |
General Havoc
Messages: 1564
Registered: February 2003
Location: Birmingham, England, Unit...
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Loosing both is worse because some n00b keeps shooting the enemy with a blue repair beam and sticking black boxes that explode to friendly tanks. Also when they go into a friendly building and place C4 along with the enemy at the MCT and repair them. Believe me i've seen these things happen.
_General Havoc
Visit my website at http://renhelp.laeubi-soft.de powered by laeubi.de
"SHUT UP AND MOD" - Dante
"ACK is the Simon Cowell of modding" - Ultron10
Scripts.dll Debugger, Map Scripter and Tutorial writer
Computer Science Bsc
Aston University in Birmingham, UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #32042] |
Fri, 18 July 2003 03:58 |
 |
newcmd001
Messages: 88
Registered: June 2003
Location: GDI Base of Operations, B...
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Nuttavud1 |
I think,It's up to personal playing styles.  For example; I played map Under,My team won by didn't use any tanks( Def by Sydney ).The scores is most important in the map that there are base defenses(The team that always attack and lost lots of units,It will give another team's scores LOL  ).
|
Well, when we talk about tactics it's not about point, clear? Anyway, yeah, personal playing styles. Everyone has one.
Best regards,
<font color=#00FF00>[b]General Newcmd001[b]
GDI Thailand Supreme Commander</font>
Founder and leader of Th-W-H, GDI's primary taskforce in Thailand
<font color=lightgreen>Transmission ended</font>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #33386] |
Wed, 23 July 2003 10:08 |
 |
Jaspah
Messages: 1478
Registered: July 2003
Location: Syracuse, New York
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| coolmant |
| dArKz3rO |
coolmant u arent too bright are u :rolleyes: ? almost everyone above has said that a rush of tanks would quickly be chewed up by pics or ravs, and i agree. Besides, who would rush with mammys and give the enemy all those points...? your best bet on a base defence map when u lose wf or air is to point whore on the other teams rushes and try for a win by points
|
Not too bright? I have been playing this game for as long as its been out, so 2 years (I don't remember.) Anyways, I am smart enought to know that vehicles are what make Renegade the game that it is. So think next time before you post. :rolleyes: Also, why do you think vehicle rushes work in Renegade? I will run you over in my tank if I see you ingame. BTW, how do you expect to attack someone's base if they have base DEFENSES? Do you think that your 1000 point character can take out an AGT or Obolisk? NO WAY. :rolleyes:
|
Maybe a organized group of GDI could make it to Obelisk, But, AGT... :rolleyes:
As for my opinion, Both structures are equally good. 
|
|
|
|
| What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #34458] |
Mon, 28 July 2003 05:30 |
B.N.C
Messages: 32
Registered: May 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Guys, it's so simple, you get more points with vehicles and also you can easy rush with vehicles on maps with base defences, so it's simple. WF is worse to loose.
Location - Warsaw, PL
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
The methods to get points,those are tactics. METHODS 
