Re: What do you hate about Windows Vista/What can be improved/added on Windows Vista to make it bett [message #332649 is a reply to message #332645] |
Sat, 31 May 2008 00:17 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8db62/8db62bd716743124a4754ff3440c9ffec486bff4" alt="" |
Xylaquin
Messages: 257 Registered: December 2004 Location: Scotland, UK
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
Dave Anderson wrote on Sat, 31 May 2008 07:45 | Sooner or later you're just going to have to rise above yourself and realize that a single gigabyte of ram is not very much anymore and that cool technology comes with a small price, and that just happens to be system resources. Cry me a river, but its not hard to build a decent Vista machine for dirt cheap...
|
amen.
Are you seriously suggesting that Microsoft should of engineered Vista to use around the same RAM as XP? That's crazy, it's called "progress". 2GB of RAM is the average amount a gamer has these days, if not more. When XP came, it was the same, people complaining about it's memory usage, people complaining about the Fisherprice-esque shell skin. Maybe the real problem is the users who can't adjust to differences or whose PC isn't good enough.
How can you make a nexgen operating system fully function to it's potential on a lastgen computer? Refusing to blame the computer is just arrogance. I reitterate, it's called "progress".
|
|
|