Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder!
Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297058] |
Thu, 15 November 2007 23:25 |
|
Blazer
Messages: 3322 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Administrator/General |
|
|
So basically, 3 robbers broke into a guys house. The homeowner got a gun, and the 3 guys ran away. As they ran away, he shot 2 of them in the back and killed them.
Here's the fucked-up part - The robber that didn't get shot to death, they charged HIM with murder! Do you think this is fair?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311894,00.html
Quote: | LAKEPORT, Calif. — Three young black men break into a white man's home in rural Northern California. The homeowner shoots two of them to death — but it's the surviving black man who is charged with murder.
homeowner Shannon Edmonds opened fire Dec. 7 after three young men rampaged through the Clearlake house demanding marijuana and brutally beat his stepson. Rashad Williams, 21, and Christian Foster, 22, were shot in the back. Hughes fled.
Hughes was charged with first-degree murder under California's Provocative Act doctrine, versions of which have been on the books in many states for generations but are rarely used.
The Provocative Act doctrine does not require prosecutors to prove the accused intended to kill. Instead, "they have to show that it was reasonably foreseeable that the criminal enterprise could trigger a fatal response from the homeowner,"
|
[Updated on: Thu, 15 November 2007 23:27] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297078 is a reply to message #297061] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 03:51 |
MexPirate
Messages: 883 Registered: March 2006 Location: UK
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Blazer wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 00:52 | Right, but should the surviving robber be charged with the double-murder of his buddies who got shot?
|
assuming he was the one who organised the robbery, yes 100%, if that's the case he put them in the position where their lives were at risk, hope he rots in jail for the rest of his miserable life.
It's a mexican pirate .... F*ck a dog by Blink 182
|
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297082 is a reply to message #297063] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 05:10 |
|
Blazer
Messages: 3322 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Administrator/General |
|
|
Goztow wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 00:35 |
Blazer wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 07:52 | Right, but should the surviving robber be charged with the double-murder of his buddies who got shot?
|
If he organised the whole thing... he should at least have shared responsibility for the murder, yes.
|
Who said he organized it? It was just 3 potheads looking to steal some medical marijuana and things got out of hand. How is any 1 of the guys responsible for the death of the other two?
Using your logic, I'm driving a car with you and someone else riding along. A truck comes and hits us head-on, killing me and our buddy, and they charge YOU with our deaths...does that make sense?
Like I said in most states you are allowed to shoot and kill trespassers in your home, and I would be fine if he had shot and killed all 3 of them...but it just makes no sense that just because one of them survived, to charge him with the MURDER of his friends. He was running for his life, he didn't murder anyone!
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297100 is a reply to message #297089] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 08:12 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812 Registered: May 2007 Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
CarrierII wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 14:38 | The surviving robber should be charged with attempted robbery. End of. The honme-owner did nothing wrong, although I personally wouldn't have killed them, just shot them in the leg.
|
Agree, that's really messed up, like would YOU end someone else's life because they stole your "property" ? Your stuff can be replaced, not a life. But, if only shot them in the leg, like Carrier said, then it would be ok as a warning. If the robber gets charged and put in prison...wow then US laws are more messed up than I thought. (lol, Canada has a law which you can't buy anything more than 25 Cents all in pennies. )
Quote: | [19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
Quote: | [22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297103 is a reply to message #297089] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 08:26 |
|
cheesesoda
Messages: 6507 Registered: March 2003 Location: Jackson, Michigan
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
CarrierII wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 08:38 | The surviving robber should be charged with attempted robbery. End of. The honme-owner did nothing wrong, although I personally wouldn't have killed them, just shot them in the leg.
|
At night, while you have a rush of adrenaline? If you hit their legs, great, but if you're firing at someone who broke into your home, beat up your stepson, and you're scared for yourself and your family, you're going to shoot at them and hit them whatever way you can. What's the easiest to hit? The upper body. Where were they shot? The upper body.
Edit: To all of those who feel that a life is more important than stuff, I agree. However, you forget one thing... the robbers were impeding on someone else's rights by trespassing on their property, they over-stepped their legal boundaries, and a person has the right to do WHATEVER THEY PLEASE to protect their home. While, the government has laid out some restrictions on that, which I feel are wrong, homeowners still are well within legal rights (and rightfully so) to use lethal force when they feel threatened.
I'm glad you people aren't in my country.
whoa.
[Updated on: Fri, 16 November 2007 08:31] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297104 is a reply to message #297082] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 08:28 |
|
PlastoJoe
Messages: 647 Registered: October 2005
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Blazer wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 06:10 |
Using your logic, I'm driving a car with you and someone else riding along. A truck comes and hits us head-on, killing me and our buddy, and they charge YOU with our deaths...does that make sense?
|
You're comparing a traffic accident with a robbery? I don't think I have to tell you that that doesn't make any sense.
If you're drunk, yes it does make sense. If you're driving recklessly, either because you think it's fun or you're trying to hit someone, yes it does make sense.
You may be a fundamentalist atheist if...
Toggle Spoiler
Blazer wrote on Fri, 04 August 2006 18:53 | If you wanna be a badass ex-marine law enforcment game programmer college graduate, then you can be! I'm just glad we don't see the other part of you where you join AOL chat rooms as "hotchik69" and cyber with guys while you spank off into a sock and then cry yourself to sleep on your cock-shaped pillow.
|
tzarmind wrote on Sat, 06 January 2007 20:52 | Not only did you immaturely edit what J_Ball said in your quote. But you fucking got in the irony truck and drove it straight off a cliff.
|
Canadacdn wrote on Tue, 23 October 2007 12:04 | California burns down every year. I think it's part of nature's cycle.
|
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297119 is a reply to message #297082] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 09:18 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
Blazer wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 06:10 | Using your logic, I'm driving a car with you and someone else riding along. A truck comes and hits us head-on, killing me and our buddy, and they charge YOU with our deaths...does that make sense?
|
the "you" in your scenario isn't breaking the law, let alone "rampaging through a house" and "brutally beating his stepson"
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297126 is a reply to message #297058] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 09:36 |
|
Kytten9
Messages: 332 Registered: October 2003 Location: Manchester, England
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
None of that makes sense. I wish every country would just get laws straight....If they are in your home illegally with intent (any intent, whether assault, rape or robbery) you should legally be allowed to do whatever to secure your property and the safety of all those involved.
I disagree with charging someone for murder if that person did not "Pull the trigger" for lack of a better term. Because it isn't by the definition of 1st degree murder, 1st degree murder so why the fuck is he being charged with it? Doesn't matter if he is black, white, pink, blue or green with red stripes.....same thing goes for the "victims"
Some laws both in the USA and here in the UK impeach on basic human rights IMO.
You have a God given right to be stupid. Please do not abuse this right!
n00bstories renegade server mod.
[Updated on: Fri, 16 November 2007 09:38] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Homeowner shoots and kills robbers...surviving robber charged with the murder! [message #297159 is a reply to message #297158] |
Fri, 16 November 2007 12:47 |
|
Spoony
Messages: 3915 Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
Jecht wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 13:32 |
CarrierII wrote on Fri, 16 November 2007 07:38 | The surviving robber should be charged with attempted robbery. End of. The honme-owner did nothing wrong,...
|
I agree with this.
|
um, and assault?
Quote: | ...and brutally beat his stepson
|
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 25 08:24:24 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01391 seconds
|