Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » flamers vs mammys
icon4.gif  flamers vs mammys [message #279300] Wed, 15 August 2007 14:30 Go to next message
scarabguy is currently offline  scarabguy
Messages: 57
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
I like flames. they are cheaper that mammys, but can still kill one. i have killed a full health mammy many times with a flame. many times the drivers have been very good. but sometimes they have been noobish. i just know that ive been called noobish for buying a flame and killing that mammy camping outside our base, when everyone else was paying 100 more for stealth tanks and getting blown up.

i know other posts have been talking bout this lately, but they are old or only talk bout flames and stealths...

i dont want to bump an old post so i didn't


I don't "STEAL", I field aquire
Thanks for the free particle cannon! Wink
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279301 is a reply to message #279300] Wed, 15 August 2007 14:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
w0dka is currently offline  w0dka
Messages: 181
Registered: March 2006
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Karma: 0
Recruit
Flamers aren't that all purpose vehicles. Theyre great for a 1vs1 vs Everything, if you reach your target with not much damage taken. But fighting tanks? No. I stick to arts in long rage and lights. In bigger games a single flamer is like a big red arrow who screams "hit me or i start hit you"

not to mention their burn-down-buildings-fast ability. If you get a bunch of flamers close to a base and enemy is ill prepared... they probaly loose something what they don't wanna loose.

and if you want stoping mamys, focus them with long range weapons/PICs If you get into the missile range you're toast.
Sometimes it's even possible to kill them with inf in the melee with explosives +flamegun/chemgun but not realistic if mammy comes with childrens (f.e. other GDI fools)


Thanks.

[Updated on: Wed, 15 August 2007 14:54]

Report message to a moderator

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279305 is a reply to message #279300] Wed, 15 August 2007 15:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Lights for Nod or Meds for GDI, with a bunch of those on your team you can't lose Thumbs Up unless the other team is extremely skilled. Flame Tanks are most of the times support vehicles, as with Stealth Tanks, Stealth Tanks weren't made for direct assaults, but instead is for hit-and run or sneak attacks. Flame Tanks will destroy ANY vehicle in no time at all if you can get near the enemy in one piece. Mammoth Tanks are good in servers with Points Fix, otherwise they are slow ass point buckets.

Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279308 is a reply to message #279305] Wed, 15 August 2007 16:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
scarabguy is currently offline  scarabguy
Messages: 57
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
im talking bout maps like island, once on that map there were like three mammys right outisde our base, but with four flames i managed to kill them.

THE MATH:

4 flamers = $3200
3 mammys = $4500

you do the math.
pluss mammys cant hit flames that are right in their face, the missles miss, and the guns go fight through the flame doing no damage.


I don't "STEAL", I field aquire
Thanks for the free particle cannon! Wink
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279310 is a reply to message #279300] Wed, 15 August 2007 16:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
No, if the Mammy drivers are competent and not n00bs, they will swing their turret left and right to hit you with the Tusks.

Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279343 is a reply to message #279300] Thu, 16 August 2007 00:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9738
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Flame tanks are total ownage on many maps, but not to take on mammies =/. Unless ofcourse you're on field and the mammy is right outside Nod base on its own and can't see u coming. But what are the odds?

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279346 is a reply to message #279343] Thu, 16 August 2007 02:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
scarabguy is currently offline  scarabguy
Messages: 57
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
odds are very good on some maps.
then again theres the flame rush...
on siege once with 4 flames we took out the agt in one pass, and later killed the barr and wf. gdi was mad Big Grin hehe
even tho they had a few mammys gaurding their buildings after the agt went down, we won with flame rushes. we won hehe.

[Updated on: Thu, 16 August 2007 02:52]

Report message to a moderator

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279378 is a reply to message #279300] Thu, 16 August 2007 05:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Siege = fucked up map -> Nobody would seriously play that -> Your example is worthless.
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279385 is a reply to message #279300] Thu, 16 August 2007 06:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
First of all, if you don't have something to contribute, keep it to yourself. Second, who are you? Third, Siege is one of the better maps or else BHS wouldn't have put it in a Core Patch Sarcasm

Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279396 is a reply to message #279300] Thu, 16 August 2007 07:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
1) I have contributed something.
2) I'm Surth. And you?
3) Siege is a seriously fucked up map. At least i think that.
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279398 is a reply to message #279396] Thu, 16 August 2007 07:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Surth wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 09:30

1) I have contributed something.
2) I'm Surth. And you?
3) Siege is a seriously fucked up map. At least i think that.


1.Stating he is wrong without evidence that the map sucks is not contributing.

2.k

3.Your opinion I understand, but any reasons?


Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279402 is a reply to message #279398] Thu, 16 August 2007 08:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
sadukar09 wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 09:40

Surth wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 09:30

1) I have contributed something.
2) I'm Surth. And you?
3) Siege is a seriously fucked up map. At least i think that.


1.Stating he is wrong without evidence that the map sucks is not contributing.

2.k

3.Your opinion I understand, but any reasons?


1) Evidence sounds so rude... :[
2) Reason? I never had a Enemy asking for Siege to play, which makes me think every clan we faced yet doesnt like that map.
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279405 is a reply to message #279402] Thu, 16 August 2007 08:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Surth wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 10:01

sadukar09 wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 09:40

Surth wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 09:30

1) I have contributed something.
2) I'm Surth. And you?
3) Siege is a seriously fucked up map. At least i think that.


1.Stating he is wrong without evidence that the map sucks is not contributing.

2.k

3.Your opinion I understand, but any reasons?


1) Evidence sounds so rude... :[
2) Reason? I never had a Enemy asking for Siege to play, which makes me think every clan we faced yet doesnt like that map.


Probably because those clans couldn't work out tactics on that map yet. Say Under, been played for...6 years, a lot of tactics are on Under Neutral


Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279528 is a reply to message #279300] Fri, 17 August 2007 00:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tunaman
Messages: 1190
Registered: January 2005
Karma: 2
General (1 Star)
Surth, 2v2 on siege? What clan are you again?

http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/9055/tunamanlmao.png
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279554 is a reply to message #279300] Fri, 17 August 2007 04:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Im from M2 (Kraut noobs so to say). Time & Date?
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279577 is a reply to message #279385] Fri, 17 August 2007 08:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chuck Norris is currently offline  Chuck Norris
Messages: 312
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
sadukar09 wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 08:07

Third, Siege is one of the better maps or else BHS wouldn't have put it in a Core Patch Sarcasm

As was already said, but just to bring up an example, that's not a reason to consider a map good. Look at Terrace. That map is so tipped in favor of Nod. The map has some great design and a good concept, but the base layout isn't fair.


When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris is the reason why Waldo is hiding.

When Chuck Norris does a pushup, he isn’t lifting himself up, he’s pushing the Earth down.

Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door.
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279583 is a reply to message #279300] Fri, 17 August 2007 09:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
well, looking at some of the CP Maps like... MUtation Redux...
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279596 is a reply to message #279577] Fri, 17 August 2007 10:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuzz is currently offline  Starbuzz
Messages: 2500
Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
General (2 Stars)
Chuck Norris wrote on Fri, 17 August 2007 10:55

sadukar09 wrote on Thu, 16 August 2007 08:07

Third, Siege is one of the better maps or else BHS wouldn't have put it in a Core Patch Sarcasm

As was already said, but just to bring up an example, that's not a reason to consider a map good. Look at Terrace. That map is so tipped in favor of Nod. The map has some great design and a good concept, but the base layout isn't fair.


Yeah true...if GDI does not have good Orca pilots and if the team is relaxing, it will become a nightmare.

On one game in the Jelly mappack server, I was in a Orca and I killed 13 stanks, 2 lights, and 1 APC trying to attack my base. And I did not make that up. One of my most memorable games. And there were about 25 players or so in that game. Nod started calling me "camping bitch."

But I agree, Nod has way too much advantage on that map. A stank can easily sneak behind a WF from that hill and lay a beacon and stop over it. I did that once too and succeded. And taking out the GDI ref is piece of cake. That's unfair. The PP location is just unfair too.

Orcas are important in that map...you pretty much have to be straffing the ground around your base all game to find stanks.



buzzsigfinal

[Updated on: Fri, 17 August 2007 10:54]

Report message to a moderator

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279689 is a reply to message #279596] Fri, 17 August 2007 18:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
superj69 is currently offline  superj69
Messages: 309
Registered: September 2005
Location: Hamilton , Ontario
Karma: 0
Recruit
Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 17 August 2007 13:51


On one game in the Jelly mappack server, I was in a Orca and I killed 13 stanks, 2 lights, and 1 APC trying to attack my base. And I did not make that up. One of my most memorable games. And there were about 25 players or so in that game. Nod started calling me "camping bitch."




so your were called a 'camping bitch' for stay by your base and defending it for a game.... seems more like your just a good team player. Whats That

[Updated on: Fri, 17 August 2007 19:11]

Report message to a moderator

Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279751 is a reply to message #279554] Sat, 18 August 2007 04:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnDoe is currently offline  JohnDoe
Messages: 1416
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Surth wrote on Fri, 17 August 2007 06:26

Im from M2 (Kraut noobs so to say). Time & Date?


lol


lol
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279812 is a reply to message #279751] Sat, 18 August 2007 13:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
scarabguy is currently offline  scarabguy
Messages: 57
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Recruit
dudes, stay on topic...

another of my exploits...

islands again, jelly server (RA)

two mammys were in fromt of gdi's base, on the first island. i came around the rock so that i was behind them with my flame and killed one and left one in the yellow zone healthwise.
they werent the only ones around tho... there were apcs and a med too....


I don't "STEAL", I field aquire
Thanks for the free particle cannon! Wink
Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279821 is a reply to message #279300] Sat, 18 August 2007 13:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:


they werent the only ones around tho... there were apcs and a med too....

Not to mention all the Pirates shooting their harpoons at you.
icon11.gif  Re: flamers vs mammys [message #279825 is a reply to message #279821] Sat, 18 August 2007 14:05 Go to previous message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
had to bring out the pirates eh surth Sarcasm

flame tanks seem to have beastly heavy armor, and the second they're on a tank that tank is probably fuxx0rd Whats That


liquidv2
Previous Topic: APC Exit location...VERY URGENT!
Next Topic: Infantry
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 23 03:08:22 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01255 seconds