|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263696 is a reply to message #263679] |
Wed, 06 June 2007 13:36   |
 |
AoBfrost
Messages: 1248
Registered: March 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
It's a good idea to rush with 3-4 stanks to kill something even if 1-2 hotties are repairing, more is even better.
It's funny to watch noobs buy 1 stank then rush in a ame with 8-10 people per team, then they complain stanks are weak and slow, so they tell all to buy flamers since they are stronger......
Flamer=more armor, weaker, slower, can shoot 15 feet from tank, crap in large games.
Stank: less armor, stronger, faster, stealthed, longer range, better in large games.
Heck i've even killed the agt with a light tank rush.
| Scrin wrote on Fri, 05 October 2007 12:19 |
''whoa im the photoshop''
|
KANE LIVES!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263714 is a reply to message #263679] |
Wed, 06 June 2007 14:08 |
 |
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
STanks are only really good on bigger maps like city and field where you aren't seen so easily (say, like on canyon or something)
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263923 is a reply to message #263679] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 08:58 |
 |
sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
arties 92 stanks are 90
| Quote: |
[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
| Quote: |
[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263940 is a reply to message #263831] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 10:05 |
|
AoBfrost
Messages: 1248
Registered: March 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Ralphzehunter wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 02:09 |
The stank, flamer, and arty do around the same damage over time
|
ROFL! if they did same damage, then why is it 1 flamer vs hotty, the person can still repair the building easily, with stank vs hotty, the building wont repair as easy, it'll just continuously be damaged, then repaired then damage, and so on everytime the stank fires.
| Scrin wrote on Fri, 05 October 2007 12:19 |
''whoa im the photoshop''
|
KANE LIVES!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263949 is a reply to message #263940] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 10:38 |
 |
Spoony
Messages: 3915
Registered: January 2006
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars)
Tactics & Strategies Moderator |
|
|
| AoBfrost wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 12:05 |
| Ralphzehunter wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 02:09 |
The stank, flamer, and arty do around the same damage over time
|
ROFL! if they did same damage, then why is it 1 flamer vs hotty, the person can still repair the building easily, with stank vs hotty, the building wont repair as easy, it'll just continuously be damaged, then repaired then damage, and so on everytime the stank fires.
|
The overall damage is roughly the same.
Unleash the Renerageâ„¢
Renedrama [ren-i-drah-muh]
- noun
1. the inevitable criticism one receives after doing something awful
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263954 is a reply to message #263940] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 10:49 |
FrAM
Messages: 131
Registered: May 2007
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| AoBfrost wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 20:05 |
| Ralphzehunter wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 02:09 |
The stank, flamer, and arty do around the same damage over time
|
ROFL! if they did same damage, then why is it 1 flamer vs hotty, the person can still repair the building easily, with stank vs hotty, the building wont repair as easy, it'll just continuously be damaged, then repaired then damage, and so on everytime the stank fires.
|
because if u dont know how to use flamer correctly, or have to stay close to building a flamer cannot give full damage as most of flames go straight through wall, however stank does full damage when right at wall.
Flamers are good for point whoring, their armour makes them harder to take out with c4 and on volcano an early flamer can gain u alot of dosh
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #263972 is a reply to message #263679] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 12:22 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
make the blue part of the flame shoot not the yellow part...did u fail science or something? cuz u should know blue flames hotter than yellow...
| Quote: |
[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
| Quote: |
[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
[Updated on: Thu, 07 June 2007 12:22] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #264067 is a reply to message #263972] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 17:28 |
FrAM
Messages: 131
Registered: May 2007
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| EKT-Sadukar wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 22:22 |
make the blue part of the flame shoot not the yellow part...did u fail science or something? cuz u should know blue flames hotter than yellow...
|
if ya right up against a building you cannot do that unless the building is very tall...
and the point i was making is the majority of people dont realize how to get full potential from a flamer...
a hotty can beat a flamer but it does take a while.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #264073 is a reply to message #263679] |
Thu, 07 June 2007 17:52 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
u can beat ANY yes ANY inf with flamer if it gets close. just target them with 1 cannon then...*Boink*
| Quote: |
[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
| Quote: |
[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #264181 is a reply to message #264073] |
Fri, 08 June 2007 06:37 |
FrAM
Messages: 131
Registered: May 2007
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| EKT-Sadukar wrote on Fri, 08 June 2007 03:52 |
u can beat ANY yes ANY inf with flamer if it gets close. just target them with 1 cannon then...*Boink*
|
flamethrower...
|
|
|
|
| Re: Stealth Tanks? [message #264193 is a reply to message #263972] |
Fri, 08 June 2007 07:55 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285
Registered: July 2006
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star)
Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
| EKT-Sadukar wrote on Thu, 07 June 2007 20:22 |
make the blue part of the flame shoot not the yellow part...did u fail science or something? cuz u should know blue flames hotter than yellow...
|
maybe...but for some reason, i dont think the ren engine will simulate this...
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
