Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Archived Forums » RenGuard Client » Renguard 1.04
icon10.gif  Renguard 1.04 [message #228666] Mon, 30 October 2006 06:30 Go to next message
Flapstick
Messages: 3
Registered: October 2005
Karma: 1
Recruit
Awaited since February, but still not out in November. Any clue when it will be released?
Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #228667 is a reply to message #228666] Mon, 30 October 2006 07:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9738
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
When the coder for the backend will have his coding finished. So no, no clue yet.

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #228692 is a reply to message #228666] Mon, 30 October 2006 10:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
danpaul88 is currently offline  danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
It's a shame they can't bring in mode coders to work on it... unfortunately too many people would abuse the trust of BHS and release the source code so moronic cheaters can modify it to not detect their retarded cheating...

http://steamsignature.com/card/1/76561197975867233.png
Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #228893 is a reply to message #228666] Tue, 31 October 2006 19:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Canadacdn is currently offline  Canadacdn
Messages: 1830
Registered: September 2005
Location: Temple of Nod
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
PLECOS MASTER
Can't BHS just release small updates until 1.04 is done?
Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #228961 is a reply to message #228666] Thu, 02 November 2006 06:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
danpaul88 is currently offline  danpaul88
Messages: 5795
Registered: June 2004
Location: England
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
no. As has been explained before, the x64 / win 2000 problems are caused by the software which renguard is packaged in, its not renguard itself which is incompatible with x64 / win 2000, but the packaging software.

Therefore it needs pretty much rewriting completely to work in a new packager which IS x64 / win 2000 compatible.


as I understand it anyway... Razz


http://steamsignature.com/card/1/76561197975867233.png

[Updated on: Thu, 02 November 2006 06:09]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #228963 is a reply to message #228961] Thu, 02 November 2006 07:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
0x90
Messages: 142
Registered: September 2006
Location: Germany
Karma: 0
Recruit
danpaul88 wrote on Thu, 02 November 2006 14:08

no. As has been explained before, the x64 / win 2000 problems are caused by the software which renguard is packaged in, its not renguard itself which is incompatible with x64 / win 2000, but the packaging software.

Therefore it needs pretty much rewriting completely to work in a new packager which IS x64 / win 2000 compatible.


as I understand it anyway... Razz


* Sensitive information removed by Administrator *

0x90

[Updated on: Thu, 02 November 2006 08:33] by Moderator

Report message to a moderator

Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #228971 is a reply to message #228961] Thu, 02 November 2006 08:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
danpaul88 wrote on Thu, 02 November 2006 06:08

no. As has been explained before, the x64 / win 2000 problems are caused by the software which renguard is packaged in, its not renguard itself which is incompatible with x64 / win 2000, but the packaging software.

Therefore it needs pretty much rewriting completely to work in a new packager which IS x64 / win 2000 compatible.


as I understand it anyway... Razz


No, the executable itself can be easily repackaged, but everyone on our side who has worked on it doesn't have the original 1.03 version, only edited towards 1.04 versions. Besides, we don't want to give them a head start in defeating the security of the protection software we have changed to until we have a more secure version of the client software to package up.


I'm the bawss.
icon9.gif  Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #229110 is a reply to message #228971] Fri, 03 November 2006 19:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sparks is currently offline  sparks
Messages: 9
Registered: September 2006
Location: USA
Karma: 0
Recruit
Crimson wrote on Thu, 02 November 2006 09:36


No, the executable itself can be easily repackaged, but everyone on our side who has worked on it doesn't have the original 1.03 version, only edited towards 1.04 versions. Besides, we don't want to give them a head start in defeating the security of the protection software we have changed to until we have a more secure version of the client software to package up.


A little disappointed to see that even Crimson doesn't have this thing in control.
Re: Renguard 1.04 [message #229116 is a reply to message #228963] Fri, 03 November 2006 21:13 Go to previous message
scguy318 is currently offline  scguy318
Messages: 37
Registered: October 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
0x90 wrote on Thu, 02 November 2006 08:10

danpaul88 wrote on Thu, 02 November 2006 14:08

no. As has been explained before, the x64 / win 2000 problems are caused by the software which renguard is packaged in, its not renguard itself which is incompatible with x64 / win 2000, but the packaging software.

Therefore it needs pretty much rewriting completely to work in a new packager which IS x64 / win 2000 compatible.


as I understand it anyway... Razz


* Sensitive information removed by Administrator *

0x90


Lolzers I know what you did 0x90. SVKP is bust, and I can name a billion busted packers lol. Don't get me wrong, not a fan of cheats.

[Updated on: Fri, 03 November 2006 21:18]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Rengaurd problems?
Next Topic: "Error: loader couldnt initalize server"
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 27 16:39:42 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00789 seconds