|
|
|
|
| Re: Yet another Renguard bypasser - tank10848 [message #214638 is a reply to message #214626] |
Wed, 23 August 2006 07:59   |
 |
havoc9826
Messages: 562
Registered: April 2006
Location: California, USA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
I grayed out the lines because I'm not authorized to give out anything that's exclusive to the game server admin channels (the things I left are also available in the public channel). This screenshot was obviously taken after tank10848 left, so it would not have any proof of what he did anyway. The relevant information from the public channel doesn't help all that much, except for showing two pistol kills in the same second. If you that nearly-useless log excerpt, you can get it here . If other server owners or the BHS/Renguard staff require more proof, they should ask Whitedragon to post admin channel logs in the Server Owners' Forum, since, as I said earlier, only our admins have the authority to release that information. What I will say is that in areas before the screenshot, there were messages indicating that tank10848 had killed full-health tanks with his pistol, and there was no Timed C4 present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Yet another Renguard bypasser - tank10848 [message #215506 is a reply to message #214668] |
Sun, 27 August 2006 06:39 |
 |
Ma1kel
Messages: 956
Registered: July 2005
Location: Kingdom of the Netherland...
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| the17doctor wrote on Wed, 23 August 2006 13:09 |
needless to say, you have to give evidence that he was running rg at the same time he cheated, because, even if he does use rg, it is still possible to run renegade without having renguard running.
|
He RGed himself 2 times, and he was idle on the RG network whilst cheating. Is that enough evidence?
Anyway, is he banned yet?
Dutch to English
|
|
|
|
| Re: Yet another Renguard bypasser - tank10848 [message #215520 is a reply to message #215506] |
Sun, 27 August 2006 07:43 |
Caveman
Messages: 2476
Registered: July 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Ma1kel wrote on Sun, 27 August 2006 08:39 |
| the17doctor wrote on Wed, 23 August 2006 13:09 |
needless to say, you have to give evidence that he was running rg at the same time he cheated, because, even if he does use rg, it is still possible to run renegade without having renguard running.
|
He RGed himself 2 times, and he was idle on the RG network whilst cheating. Is that enough evidence?
Anyway, is he banned yet?
|
What he is saying is that the SS that was provided didn't really explain anything except he was connected to RG. He didn't say he wasn't cheating now did he?
| CarrierII wrote |
BLUEHTHEN YOU AR NOT JUST A BIG CHEATAS AND YOU THE BIG HEAD JUST YOU USE FLY H4X FUCK YOU BIG CHEATAS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD YOU WANT I WRAUGHT THIS YOUR CHEATZ IS BAD HEY IS 1 YEAR YOUR PROMESS A FLY HAX IN MULTIPLAYER AND IS DONT JUST TROOPRM02 I TELL IT ALL WHO REPLYER IN THIS FORUM YOU CHEATZ
Please don't make me type something like that again, not using puntuation is annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
