Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Luner-Landings - What do you think.
|
|
|
|
 Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210349 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sat, 29 July 2006 12:49   |
 |
Scythar
Messages: 580
Registered: February 2003
Location: Finland
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
There's a reflector array on the moon which was placed there in -69. Even now as we speak the moon's distance from earth is being calculated by reflecting laser rays from the "mirrors". Most observatories around the world are capable of doing this...this conspiracy theory is a bit too old and has been busted hundreds of times already.
The radiation isn't any stronger on Moon than in space, your theory would also mean that spacewalks are impossible, let alone going to space in the first place. The thing is, radiation is blocked by equipment such as spacesuits and the shuttle.
There's a hole in the sky through which things can fly.
[Updated on: Sat, 29 July 2006 12:56] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210447 is a reply to message #210430] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 10:55 |
 |
terminator 101
Messages: 822
Registered: March 2003
Location: Toronto
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| csskiller wrote on Sun, 30 July 2006 11:34 |
Apparently none of you have played area 51 (or just failed to notice it). Anyways a little easter egg is in it and as you explore Area 51 you see a recording studio where the moon landing was recorded, even with cardboard backgrounds!
|
I have played that game, even if it was only demo (and it did not include the recording studio) and I found it to be quite confusing when trying to find out who is on my team and who am I supposed to kill.
Anyway, is it a good game overall or is it confusing? Or is it as good as Killzone?
"It is time you saw the future, while you still have human eyes"
Cheaters only Cheat themselves!
so
Hasta la vista, baby!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210509 is a reply to message #210351] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 18:29 |
 |
jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Dogg wrote on Sat, 29 July 2006 20:53 |
| help-linux wrote on Sat, 29 July 2006 14:12 |
i don't want this to turn into a argument, just a discusstion.
i dont think anybody has landed on the moon, due to the fact the suns radiation would kill them. there are many more facters.
What do you think?
|
Wouldn't the radiation kill the space walkers, shuttle riders or Space Station orbiters in the last 47 years? Or do they wear ozone generators in their suits and craft? For that matter, where there are holes in the Ozone already, wouldn't there be a circle of death where those holes hit the surface!?!?
|
NO, we are protected from radiation by the earth magnetic field.
spacewalkers are protected by that.
The ozone layer does not protect us from radiation, it protects us from ultraviolet rays? i am not certain.
anyway a contry didn't know about the hoax and though it was posiible, so on their spacecraft the put a 6 feet lead sheet around it. to protect it from radiation, well you could imagine what happend on take off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210522 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 19:29 |
|
jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
i read tha website and had to double post.
| Quote: |
The answer is: The Moon itself. Surprise! The lunar dust has a peculiar property: it tends to reflect light back in the direction from where it came. So if you were to stand on the Moon and shine a flashlight at the surface, you would see a very bright spot where the light hits the ground, but, oddly, someone standing a bit to the side would hardly see it at all. The light is preferentially reflected back toward the flashlight (and therefore you), and not the person on the side.
|
that is wrong in 2 ways:
1) when the light hits the dust it will be disperst being thrown in all directions.
2)It the person standing near it *WOULD* see it. and it would not be a bright spot.
______________==================================____________ ___
| Quote: |
Now think about the sunlight. Let's say the sun is off to the right in a picture. It is illuminating the right side of the lander, and the left is in shadow. However, the sunlight falling beyond the lander on the left is being reflected back toward the Sun. That light hits the surface and reflects to the right and up, directly onto the shadowed part of the lander. In other words, the lunar surface is so bright that it easily lights up the shadows of vertical surfaces.
|
WTF, this is complete BS. someone explane.
______________==================================____________ ___
| Quote: |
Of course a flag can wave in a vacuum
|
their is *NO* atmosphere so nothing to propel it. and there is enough gravity on the moon to hold it down. so what made it wave?
| Quote: |
Bad: When the movies of the astronauts walking and driving the lunar rover are doubled in speed, they look just like they were filmed on Earth and slowed down. This is clearly how the movies were faked.
|
not bad, if you watch James Bond, diamonds are forever. you will see a part were he breaks into a base where they are filming a moon landing. the astronoughs were moving slow just like the video of the landing.
i cannot say for certain that their has not been people on the moon but please make some better "anti-conspiricy" sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 19 22:58:42 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01197 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
