| Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210333] |
Sat, 29 July 2006 11:12  |
 |
jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
i don't want this to turn into a argument, just a discusstion.
i dont think anybody has landed on the moon, due to the fact the suns radiation would kill them. there are many more facters.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210349 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sat, 29 July 2006 12:49  |
 |
Scythar
Messages: 580
Registered: February 2003
Location: Finland
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
There's a reflector array on the moon which was placed there in -69. Even now as we speak the moon's distance from earth is being calculated by reflecting laser rays from the "mirrors". Most observatories around the world are capable of doing this...this conspiracy theory is a bit too old and has been busted hundreds of times already.
The radiation isn't any stronger on Moon than in space, your theory would also mean that spacewalks are impossible, let alone going to space in the first place. The thing is, radiation is blocked by equipment such as spacesuits and the shuttle.
There's a hole in the sky through which things can fly.
[Updated on: Sat, 29 July 2006 12:56] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210355 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sat, 29 July 2006 13:12 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
The astronauts did receive a small amount of radiation from the Van Allen belts and their time on the moon, but it was VERY small and they felt space travel was worth the risk of possibly developing cancer.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210430 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 08:34 |
 |
csskiller
Messages: 522
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Apparently none of you have played area 51 (or just failed to notice it). Anyways a little easter egg is in it and as you explore Area 51 you see a recording studio where the moon landing was recorded, even with cardboard backgrounds!
Seriously does it really matter whether or not we (as humans) made it to the moon or not?
When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself,
First as a dark demon,
As a demon it uses its power to reign death upon the land;
and then it dies.
However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns.
This time as a great hero...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210459 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 13:42 |
 |
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
I personally don't think it happened. Sometimes governments have to do things to keep a certain level of status. It was a bad time with Vietnam and America needed something other than the killing and horrid footage from the media. They needed to show hope for the future and that the human race was above barbaric acts. So they created a idea, announced the idea and set for it.
Whether or not they started with the set or they just couldn't do the real thing, I think they made a facsimile in order to better the moral of the country. Whatever did happen, it happened on December 27th just a few days before Christmas and it made everyones year a little brighter.
In todays world I think the moon could be reached briskly, but not in 1968.
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210463 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 14:20 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
If you still believe we didn't land on the moon after reading this website, then you are a disgrace to humanity and should kill yourself immediately, or at least castrate yourself to avoid any accidental passing-on of your genetic material.
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
In short, there is OVERWHELMINGLY abundant evidence that we DID go to the moon and that the footage and pictures we've seen would have been impossible to reproduce in the 1960's technology. People a lot smarter than you figured out how to get up there and land on the moon. Just because you're not smart enough to figure out how they did it, doesn't mean it didn't happen or wasn't possible.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210509 is a reply to message #210351] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 18:29 |
|
jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| Dogg wrote on Sat, 29 July 2006 20:53 |
| help-linux wrote on Sat, 29 July 2006 14:12 |
i don't want this to turn into a argument, just a discusstion.
i dont think anybody has landed on the moon, due to the fact the suns radiation would kill them. there are many more facters.
What do you think?
|
Wouldn't the radiation kill the space walkers, shuttle riders or Space Station orbiters in the last 47 years? Or do they wear ozone generators in their suits and craft? For that matter, where there are holes in the Ozone already, wouldn't there be a circle of death where those holes hit the surface!?!?
|
NO, we are protected from radiation by the earth magnetic field.
spacewalkers are protected by that.
The ozone layer does not protect us from radiation, it protects us from ultraviolet rays? i am not certain.
anyway a contry didn't know about the hoax and though it was posiible, so on their spacecraft the put a 6 feet lead sheet around it. to protect it from radiation, well you could imagine what happend on take off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210522 is a reply to message #210333] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 19:29 |
|
jnz
Messages: 3396
Registered: July 2006
Location: 30th century
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
i read tha website and had to double post.
| Quote: |
The answer is: The Moon itself. Surprise! The lunar dust has a peculiar property: it tends to reflect light back in the direction from where it came. So if you were to stand on the Moon and shine a flashlight at the surface, you would see a very bright spot where the light hits the ground, but, oddly, someone standing a bit to the side would hardly see it at all. The light is preferentially reflected back toward the flashlight (and therefore you), and not the person on the side.
|
that is wrong in 2 ways:
1) when the light hits the dust it will be disperst being thrown in all directions.
2)It the person standing near it *WOULD* see it. and it would not be a bright spot.
______________==================================____________ ___
| Quote: |
Now think about the sunlight. Let's say the sun is off to the right in a picture. It is illuminating the right side of the lander, and the left is in shadow. However, the sunlight falling beyond the lander on the left is being reflected back toward the Sun. That light hits the surface and reflects to the right and up, directly onto the shadowed part of the lander. In other words, the lunar surface is so bright that it easily lights up the shadows of vertical surfaces.
|
WTF, this is complete BS. someone explane.
______________==================================____________ ___
| Quote: |
Of course a flag can wave in a vacuum
|
their is *NO* atmosphere so nothing to propel it. and there is enough gravity on the moon to hold it down. so what made it wave?
| Quote: |
Bad: When the movies of the astronauts walking and driving the lunar rover are doubled in speed, they look just like they were filmed on Earth and slowed down. This is clearly how the movies were faked.
|
not bad, if you watch James Bond, diamonds are forever. you will see a part were he breaks into a base where they are filming a moon landing. the astronoughs were moving slow just like the video of the landing.
i cannot say for certain that their has not been people on the moon but please make some better "anti-conspiricy" sites.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Luner-Landings - What do you think. [message #210557 is a reply to message #210522] |
Sun, 30 July 2006 23:07 |
 |
xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| help-linux wrote on Sun, 30 July 2006 22:29 |
that is wrong in 2 ways:
1) when the light hits the dust it will be disperst being thrown in all directions.
2)It the person standing near it *WOULD* see it. and it would not be a bright spot.
their is *NO* atmosphere so nothing to propel it. and there is enough gravity on the moon to hold it down. so what made it wave?
|
Do you have any reputable references to back the above claims?
cause = time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
