| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #205792 is a reply to message #205723] |
Tue, 27 June 2006 17:46   |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| SuperFuckingRetard wrote on Tue, 27 June 2006 12:20 |
Oh, and did anyone hear that Limbaugh got detained for trying to smuggle drugs into the country?
|
You just can't seem to read an article and post the facts, can you?
I'm sure what you meant to state was that Rush was detained for having a bottle of viagra in his suitcase labeled with his doctors name, not his. His lawyer stated and the Dr confirmed that this was done as a favor, in an attempt to avoid any embarrasing media publicity.
But I do agree, "Smuggling Drugs" does sound like a much better way to smear a Republican you don't like.
"Strongly" asking the Army to withold money until documentation is provided is quite a stretch away from "OMG those Republican thieves are riding around in Yachts they bought with that stolen money!!" Or, am I simply mistaken? Do you, or do you not agree that not a single article you have provided has used the word "Stolen" or "Thieves"? Isn't it true that those are simply your additions to the argument?
[Updated on: Tue, 27 June 2006 17:49] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #205858 is a reply to message #204596] |
Wed, 28 June 2006 09:43 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I substitute that with reading books, darkdemin.
msgtpain, I congratulate you on your ability to actually debunk something, and I stand corrected. However, you still can't seem to grasp not using insulting language, which honestly isn't that hard, abd would quite frankly make your posts much more salubrious to read.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #205911 is a reply to message #205858] |
Wed, 28 June 2006 16:39 |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Wed, 28 June 2006 12:43 |
which honestly isn't that hard, abd would quite frankly make your posts much more salubrious to read.
|
You know what would make your posts better? If you'd stop trying to act so arrogant; especially like above... You shouldn't take the "word of the day" off your desktop calendar and attempt to use it, if you truly don't understand what it means.. Unless of course, you really do mean that you would like the act of reading my posts to promote good health, or provide some other type of well-being for you. But in that case, you should have stated "would, quite frankly, make reading your posts salubrious."
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #205927 is a reply to message #204596] |
Wed, 28 June 2006 19:00 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I actually used that word correctly. But I appreciate the dictionary regurgitation. And yes, I knew what it meant and didn't go dictionary diving for some powerful new word.
As I recall, there were actual issues at hand.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #205949 is a reply to message #205927] |
Wed, 28 June 2006 20:16 |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Wed, 28 June 2006 22:00 |
As I recall, there were actual issues at hand.
|
Exactly, like why did you see fit to add words like stolen and thieves and "missing" money to the articles you were attempting to debate?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #206021 is a reply to message #204596] |
Thu, 29 June 2006 10:55 |
 |
Fabian
Messages: 821
Registered: April 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Tue, 20 June 2006 16:15 |
I'M NOT ONLY LAZY, I LIKE TO SPAM!
|
It's not even really that long. If anyone here can't read that in under two minutes, kill yourself.
Interesting stuff, SFE. Although I think the last one is just a tad bit old.
| Quote: |
Funny that they don't think that about Clinton's little "lie" to congress.
|
Remember kids: Clinton getting head killed thousands of American lives and cost the American people hundreds of billions of dollars.
[Updated on: Thu, 29 June 2006 11:01] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #206078 is a reply to message #206021] |
Thu, 29 June 2006 22:15 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| mjfabian wrote on Thu, 29 June 2006 10:55 |
It's not even really that long. If anyone here can't read that in under two minutes, kill yourself.
|
| icedog90 wrote on Fri, 23 June 2006 14:30 |
| one winged angel wrote on Thu, 22 June 2006 12:18 |
Aircraftkiller wrote on Thu, 22 June 2006 19:49
|
Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 21 June 2006 13:50
|
Goztow wrote on Wed, 21 June 2006 02:51
|
Aircraftkiller wrote on Tue, 20 June 2006 22:15
|
TOO LONG DIDN'T READ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #206096 is a reply to message #206034] |
Fri, 30 June 2006 06:16 |
|
Fabian
Messages: 821
Registered: April 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| j_ball430 wrote on Thu, 29 June 2006 16:16 |
Remember kids, a lie isn't a bad thing as long as someone has commited a worse lie than you!
|
Well... I wouldn't say that that's true. However, it certainly is a less serious lie. I don't think all lies are equally bad and it doesn't matter what it's about--context matters!
(at least we're both thinking of the children, right?)
| Quote: |
Also, mjfabian, can you say, "innocent until proven guilty," or does that not just come into play because he's someone you hate?
|
Hey now... I just said "interesting stuff." I'm not out to jump to conclusions simply because they are convenient to me.
Thank you sir. Good to know this forum is full of 13 year olds.
[Updated on: Fri, 30 June 2006 06:17] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #206222 is a reply to message #206201] |
Sat, 01 July 2006 09:23 |
Berkut
Messages: 508
Registered: July 2005
Location: N/A
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| icedog90 wrote on Sat, 01 July 2006 01:45 |
I guess you're not smart enough to see my age in my profile. congratulations.
|
What? No. I know you're the same age as me. I just meant that there are 13-year-olds on this forum, and didn't see it as an insult.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #206223 is a reply to message #206218] |
Sat, 01 July 2006 09:46 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| mjfabian wrote on Sat, 01 July 2006 08:50 |
| icedog90 wrote on Sat, 01 July 2006 02:45 |
I guess you're not smart enough to see my age in my profile. congratulations.
|
Do I even really need to reply and say that it was implied that you were ACTING like a 13 year old, regardless of your age? I don't give a shit how old you are.
|
I love how you're one of those people that try to argue to the extreme and like to win. this is nothing, and look at how you're already beginning to throw shit at me.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #206987 is a reply to message #206223] |
Fri, 07 July 2006 12:10 |
agent_CDE
Messages: 40
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| icedog90 wrote on Sat, 01 July 2006 12:46 |
(nested quotes go here)
I love how you're one of those people that try to argue to the extreme and like to win. this is nothing, and look at how you're already beginning to throw shit at me.
|
I love how you completely fail to justify your behavior and instead turn to ad hominem attacks to discredit your adversary. Totally brilliant tactic, there.
If anyone's flining excrement, it's you. It was quite clear that he was implying you (and much of the forum) have the behavior and maturity of a 13 year old. I'm inclined to agree with him.
And in summation, a question: I could say I'm 42 years old in my profile. How old am I?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #207375 is a reply to message #207004] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 12:27 |
agent_CDE
Messages: 40
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 07 July 2006 17:25 |
"YOU ACT LIKE A 13 YEAR OLD BUT THAT'S NOT AD HOMINEM ROFLLERS!!1"
STFU@YOU.COM
YOU'RE NOT CLEVER AND YOU'RE NOT FUNNY.
|
And you are? You use the same immature allcaps YOU@STUPID.COM or some derivative thereof in every thread you post in.
I'm not attacking the poster directly, I'm expressing an opinion about his actions. I'm not trying to say "You act like a 13 year old therefore your entire argument is null and void!", so no, it isn't an ad hominem.
But of course, we all know I'm actually here to entertain everyone I meet. Oh wait...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Fraud In Iraq? Impossible. [message #207442 is a reply to message #204596] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 19:50 |
agent_CDE
Messages: 40
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Pot. Kettle. Black.
I have never said anything referencing motives. I have never used my own opinions (despite my voicing them) in an attempt to justify my position.
But if you insist I'm a hypocrite, then YOU have done nothing but bare your holier-than-thou attitude for all to see. YOU constantly fire off immature attempts at "insults" with this web address gimmick - and I don't particularly care how recent it is or how delicately you assume you wield it. YOU continue to (incorrectly) assume what you say is automatically correct. YOU continue to act like a general troll and make an ass of yourself. The only reason you command anything vaguely resembling respect is that you happen to be able to make Renegade maps.
And I am not wasting my time with this shit any longer. I suggest you go back to making maps instead of proving yourself even more of an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
