| DEATH TO IRAN [message #197548] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 12:28  |
|
|
Is anybody going to attack Iran yet, I mean man, how long have they
been trying to get those nukes! And we all just stand by watching,
while a nation that wants all of us to die get a very destructive
weapons, (there are worse weapons than the nuclear bomb) and our
damn president is acting like a little lost boy in the White House
pretending that he dosen't know squat about this issue. By the way
have all of you been watching the news lately, the news is only
about souther California, not 1 mile away from it, no world news,
just celebrities buying new underwear and having sex. Thats it.
What are all of you people going to do about it, you people need to
wake up and smell the hate and anticipation!
Seriously people how can you fight a war on terrorism with all of your borders wide open!
The Goverment Has Failed All Of You.
Americas Founding Fathers Must Be Turing In Their Graves, As Well As Every Revolutionary, Every Soldier That Has Fought For This Great Country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197564 is a reply to message #197548] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 16:31  |
 |
csskiller
Messages: 522
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
The US (and Canada) seriously need to finish their job in Iraq / Afghanistan before this happens.
When history witnesses a great change, Razgriz reveals itself,
First as a dark demon,
As a demon it uses its power to reign death upon the land;
and then it dies.
However, after a period of slumber, Razgriz returns.
This time as a great hero...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197651 is a reply to message #197631] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 10:19 |
Weirdo
Messages: 369
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| Quote: |
They are obviously reaserching those weapons, they've been telling the whole world that! Big Grin
|
Last thing I heard, they told the whole world they were only making enriched uranium. Wich they use for nuclear power plants. This doesn't mean that they also make nucleair missles.
I would advise not to attack without first getting the help of the UN again. It's really not good for international politics, to try and speed up a war against a country with evidence that later appears to be false.
I don't see why you should be afraid of a country, Like Iran in the first place. They have nothing to gain with a war against the western world. A Frontal attack will only mean suicide.
My guess is they are just showing a bit of, with their nucleair projects as a bit of propaganda to their own people.
If you are really afraid of a nuclear war, you should focus more on North Korea than on Iran.
Size doesn't matter.
[Updated on: Tue, 25 April 2006 10:20] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197665 is a reply to message #197564] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 11:51 |
|
|
| csskiller wrote on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:31 |
The US (and Canada) seriously need to finish their job in Iraq / Afghanistan before this happens.
|
What the fuck is our job in Iraq? We aren't leaving Afghanistan though, I think the current (and preceding) governement(s) made that clear enough.
FUCK
[Updated on: Tue, 25 April 2006 11:53] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197685 is a reply to message #197665] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 13:55 |
Homey
Messages: 1084
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Comrade wrote on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:51 |
| csskiller wrote on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:31 |
The US (and Canada) seriously need to finish their job in Iraq / Afghanistan before this happens.
|
What the fuck is our job in Iraq? We aren't leaving Afghanistan though, I think the current (and preceding) governement(s) made that clear enough.
|
I'm pretty sure he just is just talking about Canada in Afghanistan and America in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
Homey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197784 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 08:23 |
 |
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Yea, Iran needs to be dealt with, because it's a well known fact that Iran doesn't have the right to have nuclear weapons, when other minor world powers can. Hypocrisy par none. If they can't have nukes, why can we?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating nuclear war, but if we want them to disarm, why don't we (We, refering to the United States)?
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197817 is a reply to message #197631] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 12:48 |
|
|
| Wierdo wrote on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:51 |
If you are really afraid of a nuclear war, you should focus more on North Korea than on Iran.
|
You are right, what ever happend to North Korea, it's like they just dissapeared. I know a person who's familiy works deeply in the goverment, like the IRS, and other services I won't list, he told me that they already have a nuclear bomb and a way to deliver it.
But I think that  America absolutely has the power to occupy all of the threatning nation at once, I really do.
Seriously people how can you fight a war on terrorism with all of your borders wide open!
The Goverment Has Failed All Of You.
Americas Founding Fathers Must Be Turing In Their Graves, As Well As Every Revolutionary, Every Soldier That Has Fought For This Great Country.
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197822 is a reply to message #197817] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 13:16 |
 |
Toolstyle
Messages: 215
Registered: May 2004
Location: Manchester
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Do you just let rip the first brain fart that arrives in your head?
| Aircraftkiller |
That's irrelevant to this thread.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric:
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197823 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 13:27 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
N. Korea has nukes already. How do we stop them when they already have them?
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197824 is a reply to message #197823] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 13:33 |
|
Toolstyle
Messages: 215
Registered: May 2004
Location: Manchester
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
WE ATTACK THEM AND INVADE AND OCCUPY THEM AND KILL THEM AND STUFF!!!!!!!!11
| Aircraftkiller |
That's irrelevant to this thread.
Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric:
Ad hominem - attacking the arguer and not the argument.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197839 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 15:05 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
For the record, attacking Iran is a bad idea.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197841 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 15:11 |
Appsh0t
Messages: 4
Registered: April 2006
Location: Da OC
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
US just wants to rule the world. thats all
they went in iraq and found what weapons of mass destruction
here in US there is millions of weapons of mass destruction.
Just becuz they have a weak army, US gets all crazy and goes nuts and says lets attack them and makes up reasons
they r making uranium. so, they r going to use it for power plants, doenst US have nukes already. so WTF is their problem
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197845 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 15:46 |
 |
PlastoJoe
Messages: 647
Registered: October 2005
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Because the United States has signed a non-proliferation treaty and has no intention of using their warheads on another country in the forseeable future, while Iran has neither of these qualities?
The US didn't attack Iraq "becuz they have a weak army." It was because we suspected that they were secretly stockpiling biological and chemical weapons to use against Israel and Kuwait (and Iran, but we didn't care so much about this). Or because George W. wanted to finish the job George H.W. started in the Gulf War, which should have been done the first time.
(Just so you know, at the time of the Gulf War in 1991, Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world.)
I hope you're not so naive to assume that Iran will not try to make nuclear weapons once they have the ability to refine uranium. They have two reasons to do so: to have a bargaining chip in diplomatic relations with the West (mainly over oil) and to threaten/attack their rivals in the Middle East (Israel, Iraq, Saudi Arabia).
And what a stupid title for a thread. Sounds a lot like what's being chanted in Iran about America. But I guess if thrash300 says it, that makes it ok.
You may be a fundamentalist atheist if...
Toggle Spoiler
| Blazer wrote on Fri, 04 August 2006 18:53 |
If you wanna be a badass ex-marine law enforcment game programmer college graduate, then you can be! I'm just glad we don't see the other part of you where you join AOL chat rooms as "hotchik69" and cyber with guys while you spank off into a sock and then cry yourself to sleep on your cock-shaped pillow.
|
| tzarmind wrote on Sat, 06 January 2007 20:52 |
Not only did you immaturely edit what J_Ball said in your quote. But you fucking got in the irony truck and drove it straight off a cliff.
|
| Canadacdn wrote on Tue, 23 October 2007 12:04 |
California burns down every year. I think it's part of nature's cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197849 is a reply to message #197823] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 16:21 |
Homey
Messages: 1084
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Dover wrote on Wed, 26 April 2006 16:27 |
N. Korea has nukes already. How do we stop them when they already have them?
|
Exactly, Iran doesn't have them yet, or as far as we know. If action is taken quickly it won't be a problem. If the US is going to deal with this problem, they should sooner rather than later.
Homey
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197890 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 19:19 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
I say let Israel deal with it. They surely will if nobody else does, and the US has plenty of unfinished work on the table right now. I'd bet good money they'll be extremely efficient about the whole affair, too.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197894 is a reply to message #197548] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 19:56 |
|
Dover
Messages: 2547
Registered: March 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
So, Iran can have nukes when it signs the non-proliferation treaty? Doubtful.
Why? Because Iran is not the U.S., nor is it any of the U.S.'s historical allies, therefore the U.S. will feel (Or pretend to feel in order to have a somewhat proper pretense for war) threatened by Iraq having nukes.
Russia has nukes, why aren't we worried about them? WHAT ABOUT THE RUSSIANS MAN?! What about China? Canada? THEY HAVE NUKES! LETS GO KICK CANADA'S ASS!!
| DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 03 August 2006 19:19 |
Remember kids the internet is serious business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: DEATH TO IRAN [message #197903 is a reply to message #197839] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 20:37 |
 |
xptek
Messages: 1410
Registered: August 2004
Location: USSA
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Wed, 26 April 2006 18:05 |
For the record, attacking Iran is a bad idea.
|
Wow, there's the first and last thing we agree on.
cause = time
|
|
|
|
) 3 Votes
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
