| Re: Canada Election 2005/2006 [message #187229 is a reply to message #182453] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 12:03   |
 |
GoTWhisKéY
Messages: 320
Registered: July 2004
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
i'm open-minded about the tories, I definitely like how they want to improve ties with US, and also the 'federal accountability act' they plan on introducing. The GST cut is nice too. My prediction is the government will fall in 2 years, and the Liberals will take back the seats they lost this election.
Old School Renny
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Canada Election 2005/2006 [message #187577 is a reply to message #182453] |
Sun, 29 January 2006 01:57 |
 |
Pak
Messages: 19
Registered: February 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Liberal Party of Canada Leadership Tradition:
---Anglo Franco---
The Line:
Pearson(A) - Trudeau(F) - Turner(A) - Chrétien(F) - Martin(A) - ?(F)
The Next Leader should be French (Francophone) from Québec. People like Martin Cauchon, Denis Coderre & Stephane Dion.
Martin Cauchon has the Attribute of Justice Minister which is a need under this Ritual. NOTE: Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Jean Chrétien had the Portfilo of Justice Minister before they got to be Leader.
Frank McKenna and Michael Ignatieff maybe seen as Leadership but they are handicapped by the Anglo-Franco Tradition.
Note: Paul Martin was born in Windsor Ontario and Viewed as English and was not well liked even when he came to Québec and settled there and had been elected to Riding of LaSalle-Emard which is located on the Eastern part of Montréal (Mount Royal) Island.
Chairman and CEO of Pak Incorporated.
Member of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Member of the Liberal Party of British Columbia.
[Updated on: Mon, 19 August 2013 21:46] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Canada Election 2005/2006 [message #194095 is a reply to message #182453] |
Mon, 27 March 2006 19:56 |
 |
superj69
Messages: 309
Registered: September 2005
Location: Hamilton , Ontario
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
ok paul(bbelt2005) u r and idiot this thread was started b4 the election and that was a while ago so why not just have started a new thread instead of useing this one.i dont think u kno how forums work at all u r always screwing up thread( u didnt screw this one up,i dont think).what im sayin has nothing to do with this thread but from now on can u actually figure out what a thread is about b4 replying lol.
[Updated on: Mon, 27 March 2006 20:00] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
) 1 Vote
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
