Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » What's worse? losing barracks or wf?
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963541] Sun, 23 February 2003 13:51 Go to next message
Anonymous
I'm thinking the barracks would be the worse loss. Either building is best kept intact, but still.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963540] Sun, 23 February 2003 14:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
My opinion is considering the big picture losing the barraks hurts worse.

The cheapest vehic is still more expensive than the cheapest char. Plus losing hotwire is definatly a bad thing. Another part of the equation is the map setup, base defenses / no base defenses.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963539] Sun, 23 February 2003 14:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Losing the Barracks is much much worse. Infantry units are always more important with vehicles. Also infantry units give less points if they are hit or they die. Another thing, who do you think would win? 40 player server. GDI has lost their Weapons Factory and Nod still has all of their structures. 20 players on GDI have an assortment of units ranging from hotwires to gunners to Ion Cannon Sydney. Now who would win? 20 hotwires, gunners, and Ion Cannon Sydneys or 8 flame tanks, light tanks, and/or stealth tanks? I would bet on the infantry any day.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963538] Sun, 23 February 2003 18:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
But if there is a bse defense, the WF loos gives the other time a thing of secure, cos If you have
1 APC + 5 (normal) enineers you can easily destry a bulding, but 5 Hotw + no APC ?

Yeah I know, ther are several posybiltys to get into the bases but it is easyser to hold Inftaery (e.g. just ran over them with an buggy) than kill an APC.

But it really depends on the situation and the Map.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963537] Sun, 23 February 2003 21:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
it depends on the map, if playing with base defenses it is bad to lose the wf, if playing without defenses it is bad to lose the barracks
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963536] Sun, 23 February 2003 21:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
quote:
Originally posted by rjs87:
Losing the Barracks is much much worse. Infantry units are always more important with vehicles. Also infantry units give less points if they are hit or they die. Another thing, who do you think would win? 40 player server. GDI has lost their Weapons Factory and Nod still has all of their structures. 20 players on GDI have an assortment of units ranging from hotwires to gunners to Ion Cannon Sydney. Now who would win? 20 hotwires, gunners, and Ion Cannon Sydneys or 8 flame tanks, light tanks, and/or stealth tanks? I would bet on the infantry any day.

public server YES clan server NO.

I would prefer to lose the WF.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963535] Sun, 23 February 2003 22:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Definitly barracks is the worst to loose. Loosing the barracks means no more mines and whats worst is it then takes 2 engies to destroy a building. We all know how hard it is sometimes to find someone to tag along with you to engie rush.
Speaking of lack of teamwork, I have seen many games Nod has lost because someone nuked the WF first. It seems like as soon as WF goes everyone gets a PIC or Mobius and starts defending. Any unorginized Nod rush of any kind will never make it against a base full of PIC/Mobius's.
So unless you feel you got a well orginized team never ever nuke WF first. That's just my opionin though.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963534] Mon, 24 February 2003 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
bar
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963533] Tue, 25 February 2003 02:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
quote:
Originally posted by cheeta31:
it depends on the map, if playing with base defenses it is bad to lose the wf, if playing without defenses it is bad to lose the barracks

Ctrl + 7
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963532] Tue, 25 February 2003 08:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Id say the WF is worse to lose if the map has defences, it makes it almost impossible to run into a base and take out a few buildings [Razz]

but a map without defences would suck to lose the Bar. lose that and lose your defensive mines [Frown]
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963531] Wed, 26 February 2003 00:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Indeed, try winning on maps like City when you are Nod without vehicles [Razz]
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #-963530] Thu, 27 February 2003 04:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Last night I played a game on Mesa. When I joined, the airstrip was down. I was Nod. We were about 3000 points behind (GDI 7500 Nod 4500). Everyone bought LCG, Technicians, and Raveshaws, and we kept pounding GDI's Harvester and every tank they sent to our base for points.

Later they managed to take out our refinery, still, everyone had at least 500 credits for another LCG. This was with about 8 minutes left. In the end, we (Nod) won by simply defending our base, with about 2000 credits more than GDI (GDI 16000 Nod 18000).
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18008] Thu, 01 May 2003 09:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xpontius is currently offline  xpontius
Messages: 259
Registered: April 2003
Location: Reno
Karma: 0
Recruit
Unless you like to point whore and love metal i think bar as said most of the way down is more important to the well being of your base Razz
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18009] Thu, 01 May 2003 09:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Majiin Vegeta is currently offline  Majiin Vegeta
Messages: 2186
Registered: February 2003
Location: London
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
if you kill the wepas firsts its bad for Nod as GDI just buy loads of pics/mobuisses which eats up any attcks made my Nod Shocked
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18071] Thu, 01 May 2003 15:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
coolmant is currently offline  coolmant
Messages: 219
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
War Fac. Think about it, you can't produce vehicles, so the other team rushes you with flame tanks or mammoths. Who will win? :rolleyes:

Goodbye and thanks for all the games Westwood!

http://www.imercenari.it/images/smile/MS220Salute.gif You will solute me!

"Keep 'em comin!"
-Havoc

WOL: coolmant, poisionous_frog (Gamespy)
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18077] Thu, 01 May 2003 15:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dArKz3rO is currently offline  dArKz3rO
Messages: 1
Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
coolmant u arent too bright are u :rolleyes: ? almost everyone above has said that a rush of tanks would quickly be chewed up by pics or ravs, and i agree. Besides, who would rush with mammys and give the enemy all those points...? your best bet on a base defence map when u lose wf or air is to point whore on the other teams rushes and try for a win by points
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18083] Thu, 01 May 2003 17:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DukeLeto is currently offline  DukeLeto
Messages: 21
Registered: April 2003
Location: Peaceful Caladan
Karma: 0
Recruit
IMO, PP ios the worst thing; without one, you basically can't buy anything and your defenses don't work...

But of the two, I say WF because without it, you have no vehicles, whereas you still have 4 character choices if you lose ref. Besides, with no vehicles, your team will be owned by Snipers.

And yes indeedy, I HAVE single-handedly taken out many a high-price vehicle as a free character.


http://www.angelfire.lycos.com/alt/dukeleto/images/DukeLetosig1.jpg
--------------------------
"For the Duke!"
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18158] Fri, 02 May 2003 07:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
coolmant is currently offline  coolmant
Messages: 219
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
dArKz3rO

coolmant u arent too bright are u :rolleyes: ? almost everyone above has said that a rush of tanks would quickly be chewed up by pics or ravs, and i agree. Besides, who would rush with mammys and give the enemy all those points...? your best bet on a base defence map when u lose wf or air is to point whore on the other teams rushes and try for a win by points


Not too bright? I have been playing this game for as long as its been out, so 2 years (I don't remember.) Anyways, I am smart enought to know that vehicles are what make Renegade the game that it is. So think next time before you post. :rolleyes: Also, why do you think vehicle rushes work in Renegade? I will run you over in my tank if I see you ingame. BTW, how do you expect to attack someone's base if they have base DEFENSES? Do you think that your 1000 point character can take out an AGT or Obolisk? NO WAY. :rolleyes:


Goodbye and thanks for all the games Westwood!

http://www.imercenari.it/images/smile/MS220Salute.gif You will solute me!

"Keep 'em comin!"
-Havoc

WOL: coolmant, poisionous_frog (Gamespy)
WF is of course far more worse [message #18514] Sun, 04 May 2003 03:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jsival is currently offline  jsival
Messages: 4
Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
I have played Renegade more than a year and it's far more worse when you lose the WF. Especially in maps with base defences. TANKS will give you the power the team need and also the points. Infantry can be easily killed by the advanced tank driver. And tanks are far more difficult to destroy. In maps without base defences the Hand of NOD would be of course a great loss to NOD because of the technicians and the sthblack hands who will place beacons in the GDI base. But in games with base defences you will be doomed if the WF or AS is destroyed.
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18546] Sun, 04 May 2003 07:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Commando no. 448 is currently offline  Commando no. 448
Messages: 229
Registered: February 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Infront...
Karma: 0
Recruit
I would prefer having the barracks. Because infantry are the variety in the game. Infantry can do any role expect charging a base defence. Vehicles are best used against vehicles. The anti-infantry vehicles are weak and would be chewed up by sniphers or a few well place anti-tank shots. Infantry are also needed to hold down the places tanks can't go. Sure the shotgun can shine in the tunnels but it is nothing compared to the tiberium weapons in there. And tanks aren't the ones clearing out bunkers (well maybe an arty shot) you need infantry to get in there and chase the enemy out of fortifications. And where would we be without the hotwire as said above? And who would take out the artillery weapons? 3 MRLS would chew up a tank trying to leave a base. But a snipher in could slip out the tunnels and make those MRLS wonder where their health is going. And where would Nod be without the stealth black hand. He is the one that slips up behind sniphers and into buildings to plant the nuke. Try planting a nuke with a rifle infantry.
How about recon? I am sure it is harder to spy when your in a buggy then when you are hiding with a snipher. And what would you do without your PIC players? Those flame tanks wil BBQ the medium tanks but will have trouble getting that PIC just out of reach on the hill or in the tunnel.

So you see how variety of the barracks outweighs the slugging power of the war factory?


Your mind is weaker-Einsteinb (WOL, WWEXP forums, Generally everywhere I don't need a different name)
We invented statistics for people who can't keep bullets out of their head-Commando no. 448
http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca/images/flag.gif
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18549] Sun, 04 May 2003 08:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bassoonboy is currently offline  Bassoonboy
Messages: 140
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
If you lose the bar you can actually use it to your advantage. Rush and get a couple of shots in on their 1000 credit characters, and get more points from that then they do when they kill you. And, it is possible to fight tank rushes with engys :twisted:
c4 hehehehhehehhehehehheeh c4 booom hehhehe


http://www.spacefem.com/uselessquiz/07.gifhttp://www.maethos.info/~spacefem/negativeblob.gif
I am invincible!!<----Really cool screenie
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18722] Mon, 05 May 2003 09:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xpontius is currently offline  xpontius
Messages: 259
Registered: April 2003
Location: Reno
Karma: 0
Recruit
Just dont get squishied by those faster tanks Laughing
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18724] Mon, 05 May 2003 09:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HTDana is currently offline  HTDana
Messages: 62
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
On the whole, I'd rather lose the WF. There's just too much defensive and offensive variety coming out of the barracks, between PICs/Raveshaws and techs/Hotwires (never mind all our personal favorites notwithstanding).

HTDana
HazardTeam
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #19130] Tue, 06 May 2003 22:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
[sg]the0ne is currently offline  [sg]the0ne
Messages: 442
Registered: February 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Karma: 0
Commander

bar is worse.
having a wep doesn't help repair shit faster.


yahoo : chapstic25
aim : lamant281
What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #20347] Tue, 13 May 2003 20:12 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Afromn96 is currently offline  Afromn96
Messages: 123
Registered: April 2003
Location: USA, CA
Karma: 0
Recruit
i have won many times when losing WF i always snipe the engis that get out of their vehicles 2 repair them in field. Me and a friend once were bh's sniping and they had 2 mammys in the field engis got out 2 repair it 2 head shots and the game was won, they didnt expect 2 mammys commin 4 em, lol

AFRO_MAN96 [wol names:Afromn96, sicilian69]
"you mess with the fro you got to go"
-Eddie Griffin
Previous Topic: strategy, give yours
Next Topic: Would A kangaroo with a pistol be funny? yes/no
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Dec 03 11:49:16 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01010 seconds