Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » What's worse? losing barracks or wf?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

What's worse? losing barracks or wf? [message #18546]

Sun, 04 May 2003 07:43

Commando no. 448
Messages: 229
Registered: February 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Infront...

Karma:

Recruit

I would prefer having the barracks. Because infantry are the variety in the game. Infantry can do any role expect charging a base defence. Vehicles are best used against vehicles. The anti-infantry vehicles are weak and would be chewed up by sniphers or a few well place anti-tank shots. Infantry are also needed to hold down the places tanks can't go. Sure the shotgun can shine in the tunnels but it is nothing compared to the tiberium weapons in there. And tanks aren't the ones clearing out bunkers (well maybe an arty shot) you need infantry to get in there and chase the enemy out of fortifications. And where would we be without the hotwire as said above? And who would take out the artillery weapons? 3 MRLS would chew up a tank trying to leave a base. But a snipher in could slip out the tunnels and make those MRLS wonder where their health is going. And where would Nod be without the stealth black hand. He is the one that slips up behind sniphers and into buildings to plant the nuke. Try planting a nuke with a rifle infantry.
How about recon? I am sure it is harder to spy when your in a buggy then when you are hiding with a snipher. And what would you do without your PIC players? Those flame tanks wil BBQ the medium tanks but will have trouble getting that PIC just out of reach on the hill or in the tunnel.

So you see how variety of the barracks outweighs the slugging power of the war factory?

Your mind is weaker-Einsteinb (WOL, WWEXP forums, Generally everywhere I don't need a different name)
We invented statistics for people who can't keep bullets out of their head-Commando no. 448

http://www.canadianheritage.gc.ca/images/flag.gif

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 13:51
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 14:12
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 14:56
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 18:24
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 21:04
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 21:29
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Sun, 23 February 2003 22:27
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Mon, 24 February 2003 17:08
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Tue, 25 February 2003 02:57
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Tue, 25 February 2003 08:37
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Wed, 26 February 2003 00:42
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Anonymous on Thu, 27 February 2003 04:29
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: xpontius on Thu, 01 May 2003 09:26
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Majiin Vegeta on Thu, 01 May 2003 09:45
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: coolmant on Thu, 01 May 2003 15:26
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: dArKz3rO on Thu, 01 May 2003 15:39
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: DukeLeto on Thu, 01 May 2003 17:12
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: coolmant on Fri, 02 May 2003 07:50
		WF is of course far more worse By: jsival on Sun, 04 May 2003 03:34
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Commando no. 448 on Sun, 04 May 2003 07:43
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Bassoonboy on Sun, 04 May 2003 08:21
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: xpontius on Mon, 05 May 2003 09:41
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: HTDana on Mon, 05 May 2003 09:45
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: [sg]the0ne on Tue, 06 May 2003 22:16
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Afromn96 on Tue, 13 May 2003 20:12
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: -Tech- on Tue, 13 May 2003 22:19
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Argon Vex on Sun, 18 May 2003 03:31
		Re: What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nightma13 on Sun, 25 May 2003 09:39
		Souper By: Azndemon989 on Mon, 16 June 2003 12:50
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: maytridy on Mon, 16 June 2003 14:11
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: General Havoc on Mon, 16 June 2003 16:43
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Tue, 17 June 2003 07:50
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nuttavud1 on Mon, 30 June 2003 07:21
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: yahoo on Thu, 17 July 2003 13:39
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Fri, 18 July 2003 03:58
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nuttavud1 on Sat, 19 July 2003 08:28
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Sun, 20 July 2003 07:10
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Nuttavud1 on Wed, 23 July 2003 05:42
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: newcmd001 on Wed, 23 July 2003 06:19
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: Jaspah on Wed, 23 July 2003 10:08
		What's worse? losing barracks or wf? By: B.N.C on Mon, 28 July 2003 05:30

Previous Topic:	strategy, give yours
Next Topic:	Would A kangaroo with a pistol be funny? yes/no

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Nov 25 13:56:58 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01280 seconds