Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate
Re: Patriot Act Renewal rejected by the Senate [message #182943 is a reply to message #182538] Tue, 20 December 2005 21:05 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma:
Colonel
SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Sat, 17 December 2005 23:01

Don't worry, President Bush is illegally authorizing spying anyways.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/12/17/113212/10

EDIT: Oh, and gbull, why'd you say no if you're in support of the War in Iraq? (You still are, right?)



You need to learn what the president can and can't do first.


The ability of the 1978 FISC act to limit the ability of the executive branch depends on how the 1972 United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan et al, (407 U.S. 297) is interperted by the courts. The court stated
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&am p;vol=407&invol=297

Quote:

We begin the inquiry by noting that the President of the United States has the fundamental duty, under Art. II, 1, of the Constitution, to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Implicit in that duty is the power to protect our Government against those who would subvert or overthrow it by unlawful means. In the discharge of this duty, the President - through the Attorney General - may find it necessary to employ electronic surveillance to obtain intelligence information on the plans of those who plot unlawful acts against the Government.


Quote:

Further, the instant case requires no judgment on the scope of the President's surveillance power with respect to the activities of foreign powers, within or without this country.


Based on this ruling, the President may have the authority to use warentless wiretaps on Foreign National even if it involves US citizens, regardless of the FISC act. Additionally the FISC may be unconstitutional, because it may be a attempt by congress to impose restrictions on the executive Branch of the governement outside of the constitutional admendment process.



http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Texas politician proposes 50 percent game tax
Next Topic: My Opinions on Clans(Warning: Anti-Clan Rant Ahead)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Oct 22 11:45:57 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01666 seconds