Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Abortion [split]
Re: Abortion [split] [message #179545 is a reply to message #179486] Thu, 17 November 2005 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
General (1 Star)
Arcane

Wow, that was an interesting couple of posts. I thought that Nodbugger was the Master at wasting the internet, but he clearly has competition here.


Arcane

Notice the sarcasm and obnoxious tone? That is what people that either A) don't care if they offend others use, or B) the tone that someone who really doesn't have a clue but thinks that he/she does uses. Certainly when added with the critiqueing of others' sentences and such off topic comments as your difficulties with the SATs, you fall in the latter. (That would be 'B' in case you are wondering)


My opinion differing from yours is not grounds to justify that I have no "clue" about the topic. Come to think of it, you sound like Nodbugger. Isn't that funny...

You missed what I was getting at with ACK's sentence. Sentence structure is something I could care less about as long as it is legibly understandable to the competent human. My point with ACK's sentence was he was suggesting someone's idea required the assumption of another idea which it in fact did not while at the same time using a rather cryptic sentence form to convey his "point" in an attempt to silence someone else's argument. Really, it was a sidetrack to the actual conversation. Which quite frankly you have ignored entirely in your poorly attempted deridement of my thoughts and views.

Furthermore, are you suggesting that it is a mark of poor intelligence to have difficulty with certain SAT critical reading questions? Because I assure you it is not. If you have taken the SAT yourself, I'm sure you understand.

[By the way, I had no intention of gloating that I had taken the SAT if you interpreted my meaning as such. I was merely referencing a constant of how difficult sentences can be to understand fully.]

Arcane

Suggestion:
Until you grow up, and can have a proper debate, Shut up.


You know, if you say that, surely you could debate my actual stance instead of the cut & paste "You are a liberal so shut up now" response that is practically the trademark of these forums.

One last thing...

Arcane

(That would be 'B' in case you are wondering)


That sounds pretty sarcastic and obnoxious to me, doesn't it? Well, as I recall, you already set a standard for the conditions that govern those who would make remarks such as this. Let me refresh your memory...

Arcane

That is what people that either A) don't care if they offend others use, or B) the tone that someone who really doesn't have a clue but thinks that he/she does uses.


Despite the fallacies inherent in this sentence, I believe we both understand what it means. So, which category do you fit into? Personally, I think it's both.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: He's at it again. Stupid fucking douchebag.
Next Topic: Jarhead Sucks
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jan 20 09:47:42 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02310 seconds