Home » Archived Forums » RenGuard Client » Why not open source?
Re: Why not open source? [message #173446 is a reply to message #173024] |
Sat, 01 October 2005 23:22 |
|
howang
Messages: 57 Registered: September 2005 Location: Hong Kong
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
dead6re wrote on Wed, 28 September 2005 01:45 |
Your users need to learn some facts:
1) DJM is NOT part of BHS
2) I have never seen Crimson use bad languge, unless you calling in on the fake cheats!
3) I use ProcessGuard, it can tell you exactly whats its trying to access, so I can tell what is happening. I get no keyboard hooks or scanning cookies. Only renegade directory files.
4) The cd key is encrypted within Renegade, Im guessing MD5 as that is one way. This make it virtually impossible to crack it.
5) Open source would release the protocol and then a fake RenGuard client could be made! We don't want this to happen.
|
1) But BHS allow people use bad language here!
2) Take a look on the RG network ban forum, you will find some.
3) Yes, I don't think RG is spyware too, but it is really hard to let people understand this fact.
4) Don't you know that you can put the encrypted key in your registry? It is NO NEED to crack the encryption but just use the encrypted one!
5) Yes, I have think about this point before you said it.
Thanks blazer for the xwisp! My dream comes true!
<Ghostshaw> duh
<Ghostshaw> its awesome
<Ghostshaw> cheat the cheaters :P
|
|
|
|
|
Why not open source?
By: howang on Sun, 25 September 2005 03:45
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: mac on Sun, 25 September 2005 04:04
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: howang on Sun, 25 September 2005 04:36
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: light on Tue, 27 September 2005 01:25
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: Goztow on Tue, 03 January 2006 08:55
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: mac on Thu, 05 January 2006 06:51
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: mac on Sun, 25 September 2005 05:52
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: warranto on Mon, 26 September 2005 08:40
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: howang on Tue, 27 September 2005 03:24
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: Sir Kane on Tue, 27 September 2005 02:36
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: mac on Tue, 27 September 2005 03:48
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: howang on Tue, 03 January 2006 05:31
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: dead6re on Tue, 27 September 2005 10:45
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: howang on Sat, 01 October 2005 23:22
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: Kanezor on Sun, 02 October 2005 13:16
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: howang on Tue, 03 January 2006 05:22
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: Kanezor on Tue, 03 January 2006 06:17
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: howang on Tue, 03 January 2006 10:31
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: Scythar on Tue, 03 January 2006 10:42
|
|
|
Re: Why not open source?
By: Crimson on Tue, 03 January 2006 11:53
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 14 14:07:16 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00961 seconds
|