Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion » BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion (

) 4 Votes

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion [message #170877 is a reply to message #170466]

Sat, 10 September 2005 21:13

Kanezor
Messages: 855
Registered: February 2005
Location: Sugar Land, TX, USA

Karma:

Colonel

snipgod wrote on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:59

hmm, most of you know me, some of you dont, ive played this game ever since it came out, i thank crimson and all them for creating RenGuard, but i am disgusted of what it has become. A good idea has been turned into a n00b hideout. I know what many of you will say to my next comment. "get renguard its not that hard". but to tell you the truth, renguard has crapped up my computer and ren several times, has gone on freak updating sprees that never stopped until i removed it, and it lags my ren, so please dont even say it. but i cant count the number of times i have walked into a server that has the command !force renguard and have been forced to have it after getting 1 HS. ive also walked in with a name iHAXuDONT, and names like it and get forced renguard 5 seconds after i join. also all the n00bs who say RenGuard is not able to be bypassed, its a load of BS, of course it can. as a long time player of ren and mod/admin of several servers over my time, i have caught and banned dozens of people who had renguard on and running. that is what disgusts me, not the program itself, but what the program has made available for cheaters. i dont know the amount of tests i have tried to perform that the first response from the cheater is "i have renguard" it does not fool me, but it fools the lesser experienced. i remember waiting forever for this program to come out. thought it was a great idea, and really wanted to see renegade once again cheat free. unfortunatly it has not come to that, and i dare to say (not happily) RenGuard has done more harm then good to the renegade community.

Run two servers. One with RenGuard and one without. After three months, make an average of two things:

1) How many players each server has
2) How many cheaters, balanced against how many unique players (obviously a frequently full server could have more cheaters than a frequently empty server)

To do this, you'll first need to secure a CPU and bandwidth. Since Renegade's FDS is a CPU whore, you'll need 1 CPU per server. It is also a bandwidth whore, so a phat pipe is needed too. There's some $$$.

Now you'll need to get a Renegade FDS in order for it to run. Whoops, those are all snagged up by a tard who took them all! Oh, and he's not even using them all! How could he? I don't see thousands of Renegade servers, do you?! Right, so you'll need to ask him kindly for one of those. Better hope you're not on his bad side.

Okay. Now that you have all of that set up, let's wait three months.

(three months later)

Okay. I'm sure you'll note that there's not many players on your servers. One, there's already a number of other servers to choose from. So why should they play on yours? Not only that, but those other servers are also defaulted at the top of the WOL list, since they have those fucking A000000xx names, so players have to either sort the list by something other than host account names (game name and ping are common ... hope your ping is good and your name is fancy!) or specifically look for your server. That aside, let's count the number of cheaters. I'd be willing to bet that the server with RenGuard has a significantly smaller cheater/player ratio than the server without RenGuard. Sure, there might have been a few with RenGuard running that were cheating... but all in all, I'd say RenGuard is doing its purpose.

Edit:
Whoa, couple of new posts while I was writing mine, so I added a quote... :\

---

http://www.eve-online.com/download/banners/files/468x60_02.jpg

[Updated on: Sat, 10 September 2005 21:17]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Blazer on Sat, 10 September 2005 01:57
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: Xtrm2Matt on Sat, 10 September 2005 02:25
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: YSLMuffins on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:00
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: Xtrm2Matt on Sun, 11 September 2005 02:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 02:53
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Ma1kel on Sat, 10 September 2005 05:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: greb on Sat, 10 September 2005 10:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 12:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Nightma12 on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Sat, 10 September 2005 11:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: xptek on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:58
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Parad0x on Sat, 10 September 2005 16:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Nightma12 on Sat, 10 September 2005 15:02
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 20:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 20:59
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:05
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:11
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:13
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:15
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:17
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:19
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:21
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: DarkDemin on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Aircraftkiller on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:42
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: DarkDemin on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:48
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:01
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: grnfusion on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: grnfusion on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:47
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Sun, 11 September 2005 07:33
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: NukeIt15 on Sun, 11 September 2005 10:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 11:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: msgtpain on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:05
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:08
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:11
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:23
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Dave Mason on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:25
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:36
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Sun, 11 September 2005 14:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 14:50
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 11:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:06
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Blazer on Sun, 11 September 2005 19:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Mon, 12 September 2005 05:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Weirdo on Sun, 11 September 2005 23:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: light on Mon, 12 September 2005 03:19
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Belski on Mon, 12 September 2005 04:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Mon, 12 September 2005 10:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Spoony_old on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Mon, 12 September 2005 14:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Spoony_old on Tue, 13 September 2005 00:36
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:18
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: spreegem on Mon, 12 September 2005 14:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:04
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:07
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:13
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:23
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Dave Mason on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:09
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:10
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:25
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:29
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Renx on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:29
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:43
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:45
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:47
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:53
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:59
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:08
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:32
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:39
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:06
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:10
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:16
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Chronojam on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:42
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:43
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 01:48
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 03:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Belski on Tue, 13 September 2005 04:30
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 12:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: dead6re on Tue, 13 September 2005 12:58
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 06:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Tue, 13 September 2005 07:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Aircraftkiller on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:56
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Tue, 13 September 2005 14:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 17:32

Previous Topic:	ATTENTION
Next Topic:	best hoting ever

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Nov 28 04:53:53 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02203 seconds