|
|
| Re: Terrorist attack on London [message #163089 is a reply to message #163066] |
Tue, 12 July 2005 18:11   |
 |
bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Tue, 12 July 2005 15:57 |
Oh, so because our bombs are killing the families of so many in Iraq and not Syria and Iran that the people we aren't killing are going to attack us? Not so sure about that.
|
When we liberated Iraq the terrorists fled to Iran and Syria. Now they are coming back from those countries and attacking us.
Why are you having such a difficult time understanding this?
WHATEVER, FAGGOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Terrorist attack on London [message #163236 is a reply to message #162610] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 08:39 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
So, bigjoe, about how many terrorists fled out of Iraq into Syria and Iran, and how do you know, not speculate, but know that?
Oh, and turns out Abu Ghraib wasn't a few bad apples.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07 /13/AR2005071302380_pf.html
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Terrorist attack on London [message #163247 is a reply to message #162610] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 10:09 |
|
bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
You don't have to know or speculate, it's just common sense that terrorists with inadiquate weaponry wouldn't want to stick around to see themselves get smeared across the street by U.S. military strength. However, your claims about the Iraqi's blowing themselves up is completely unfounded. Why would they want to commit suicide after we finally established a civilized and working governemnt an infrastructure?
It's really not that difficult for the normal man to understand, yet you fail to because you try to hard to be smart.
And stop trying to derail the current topic at hand. We're talking about where the terrorists are coming from, not the treatment of detainees and prisoners.
AND if you're so hellbent on proving me wrong, where is your proof that the Iraqi's are killing themselves?
WHATEVER, FAGGOT
[Updated on: Thu, 14 July 2005 10:12] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Terrorist attack on London [message #164102 is a reply to message #163237] |
Sun, 24 July 2005 08:19 |
 |
Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| TheMostHated wrote on Thu, 14 July 2005 11:15 |
| gbull wrote on Wed, 13 July 2005 14:49 |
ok, i forget, what 59 leaders did they capture of ours again?
|
you stupid? i just said 59 as a number to show we ain't stopping the terrorist and how we still have nothing to show ,but saddem..
|
You stupid? You just threw out a number with no relevance to show we were losing. Good Job, love your reasoning 
[Updated on: Sun, 24 July 2005 08:20] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
