Re: Have you noticed this? [message #162086 is a reply to message #162066] |
Wed, 29 June 2005 06:49 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db217/db21785845c92ba94d7ac5759141d9fe9172a87c" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc3db/cc3dbc94562099abb4c2380fc11eef25d2052c5b" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bef2d/bef2d990c4c7fb39d603b256b3a67aaab65278c5" alt="" |
terminator 101
Messages: 822 Registered: March 2003 Location: Toronto
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
Lijitsu wrote on Wed, 29 June 2005 02:30 |
Quote: | Unreal Tournament 2003 on lowest details looks worse than Doom 2
|
Yeah, but Doom 2 doesnt have "Graphics Settings" on it, plus its a really good game anyway.
|
I know that, I was just comparing Graphics of doom 2 to Unreal Tournament 2003 on lowest graphics settings, so what are you trying to say?
Quote: | Hell, ive had games that the Game play distracted me from the poor Graphics. Example: Oni, PS2. Doom 1. Doom 2. Half-Life. Empire Earth(Zoom in on the people). Generals.
|
I don't think that Doom 2 had very bad graphics, I have seen worse (ex.: Wolfenstein 3D). There is no need to zoom in on the people in Empire Earth, so that should not really be a distraction.
I don't think Generals have bad graphics either (it looks better than RA2;))
"It is time you saw the future, while you still have human eyes"
Cheaters only Cheat themselves!
so
Hasta la vista, baby!
|
|
|