| Censorship [message #151538] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 11:02  |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Do you want aggressive censorship?[ 52 votes ] |
| 1. |
Yes, please clean this place up |
 8 / 15% |
| 2. |
Hell no! Things have been this way and should stay this way. |
17 / 33% |
| 3. |
I really don't care one way or another |
7 / 13% |
| 4. |
Just ban Aircraftkiller and everything will be fine |
20 / 38% |
Ok people, since it has become apparent that my "favourtism" isn't welcome here, I'm going to do what I have been trying to avoid.
As of this Friday, unless convinceed otherwise, I'm going to start censoring everything that would go against the forum rules. This way, the "abusive" etc. nature of Aircraftkiller's off topic posts will no longer be a threat, and no one will get away with anything.
Keep in mind, this is something that I am doing, and the other moderators and the forum administration are not bound by this.
So, speak now. Do you want things to continue as they are now, or do you want there to be more enforcement of the rules? It's all or nothing.
Yes, this would have been a click-to-vote topic, however I am unable to figure out how to set one up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151556] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 12:30  |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
NEIN! The reason some of us want Aircraftkiller banned was because he seemed to not care about anything to do with Renegade. Just a thought. Some people in the community just grew to have an extreme dislike of him.
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151615] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 16:33 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
|
Don't enforce them, everyone should suffer by Aircraftkiller's comments until they finally realize that they can just ignore them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151650] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 18:58 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Option 1 and 4 are fine for me.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151681] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 21:23 |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Man, when one person's opinion becomes an apparent consensus and a need for a public affirmation, a nerve must have been struck somewhere, lol. You do know that it would be much easier on you to simply ask ACK to stop posting the off topic threads, and asking everyone else to stop posting off topic responses to ACK's off topic posts, but if this is an easier way out of having to do that, I'll play along.
Censor away, won't bother me one bit.
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151684] |
Tue, 26 April 2005 21:33 |
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| Quote: |
Just ban Aircraftkiller and everything will be fine - 39%
|
I so badly dissagree to that, AK is who he is, why should he just change that because a few people hate him. Futhermore, I dont think he deserves to be banned for being himself.
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151733] |
Wed, 27 April 2005 06:11 |
genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| z310 |
| Quote: |
Just ban Aircraftkiller and everything will be fine - 39%
|
I so badly dissagree to that, AK is who he is, why should he just change that because a few people hate him. Futhermore, I dont think he deserves to be banned for being himself.
|
He wouldn't be changing. We would simply be getting rid of the problem. Like I said in my other post he only wants to stay here for his personal ego
Puzzle - Petals Around the Rose
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151806] |
Wed, 27 April 2005 13:31 |
 |
Walrus
Messages: 382
Registered: February 2003
Location: Good old England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I have a problem with this! It seems pointless! If the vote comes out and people want aircraftkiller banned - will he be banned?
Or will it just have been a bit of a waste - wouldn't it be smarter to have.
1hard core moderation!
2keep as is!
3I don't care!
If people want aircraftkiller banned, just a separate yes/no poll would be better.
One Last Time
"England expects that every man will do his duty"
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151811] |
Wed, 27 April 2005 13:50 |
Opalkilla
Messages: 262
Registered: September 2004
Location: USA
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
#4. Aircraftkiller needs to be banned.
|
|
|
|
| Censorship [message #151812] |
Wed, 27 April 2005 13:55 |
|
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| msgtpain |
Man, when one person's opinion becomes an apparent consensus and a need for a public affirmation, a nerve must have been struck somewhere, lol. You do know that it would be much easier on you to simply ask ACK to stop posting the off topic threads, and asking everyone else to stop posting off topic responses to ACK's off topic posts, but if this is an easier way out of having to do that, I'll play along.
Censor away, won't bother me one bit.
|
Umm, public affirmation? Since when have I cared whether or not people agreed with what I do?
This is just a chance to see which way you people wanted it to go. However, if that is too much for people to do, then it can end here.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
