|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151225] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 15:13   |
z310
Messages: 2459
Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| j_ball430 |
You know what I do when I see a post by Aircraftkiller that starts a nice little flame war? I IGNORE the ensuing flame posts or ignore the whole topic all together. That's right, I have RESTRAINT and I don't add to the flame wars. I just find the hypocricy of these types of posts/topics to be quite funny. You're the ones who ADD to the flame war, and then call for someone to get banned because you guys don't have enough self-control to stop yourselves from contributing to the flame war. Congratulations, you're all a bunch of whiny children who, when can't fix the problem by themselves, run to the closest authority to get them to fix the problem for them.
|
I always remembered you liking to argue, and at that why dont you reply? Afraid AK will kick your ass at the little flamewar/argument? 
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151228] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 15:20 |
 |
NuBCaKeS
Messages: 37
Registered: April 2005
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| IRON FART |
| icedog90 |
Crimson already said she won't ban him, she said to just ignore him and then she'll actually help out.
|
That is unfortunate. He should be banned for making so many threads spiral off topic. ...And it isn't the fault of the people replying to his posts. If he didn't make asshole remarks and correct everyone on everything, then MANY more topics would stay on track.
Like I said before, these forums are becoming a joke simply because of the sheer volume of threads that go off topic because of him.
It is sad to think that he is a total nuisance, that many people want hime gone and yet at the same time, it is already decided that he is not going to be banned. That is like giving him permission to do whatever he wants.
If it was up to me, I would opt to preserve the quality of these forums rather than keep him around.
:rolleyes:
As for the ignore feature, it isn't going to be any use untill almost everyone ignores him. I have him ignored already, and others do to, but threads still go off topic because of his posts.
|
he must be feedin miss piggy
y u jelos my member #?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151237] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 16:29 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| warranto |
| IRON FART |
...Therefore we remove the annoyance and there will be no fight.
|
You do realize how many people would be banned if Crimson were to do that to everyone who falls under this category, right?
Of course, everyone could always just take the previously suggested solution, and ignore those who would detract from what is being discussed. The topic wouldn't even deviate if people didn't respond to the attempt to derail the topic.
|
1. I don't think anyone here is seen as an annoyance as much as him.
2. If EVERYONE could always just take the previously suggested solution and do whatever, then we'd be living in a fantasy land. EVERYONE isn't going to do shit.
I'll give you a a dollar when EVERYONE here ignores his posts.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151240] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 16:41 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
The day I ban ACK for his behavior is the day I also ban the people who respond to his stupid topic derailment posts. I can remove the posts, yes, but it's insanely difficult and time-consuming to try and fix an off-topic thread.
Remember, YOU enable him to take a thread off topic when you respond to him. Resist the urge and IGNORE it.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151244] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 16:53 |
|
|
| Quote: |
And it isn't the fault of the people replying to his posts. If he didn't make asshole remarks and correct everyone on everything, then MANY more topics would stay on track.
|
No, it is their fault for replying to his posts. Threads don't go off topic because of his one post, they go off topic because people continue to reply to his post, after which said people then whine that the thread went off topic when they are the ones that helped (although some times they solely cause it to go off topic) derail it.
.:Red Alert: A Path Beyond Modeler:.
E-mail: sirphoenixx@gmail.com
AIM: Sir Phoenixx
ICQ: 339325768
MSN: sirphoenixx@hotmail.com
Yahoo: sirphoenix86
If anyone needs any help with using 3dsmax, or gmax feel free to contact me.
My Gallery: sir-phoenixx.deviantart.com/gallery
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151251] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 17:37 |
genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I agree that if someone helps a community rarely yet is very annoying that they should just be ignored when they are annoying. HOWEVER Whats the point in keeping them around if they are only annoying and never help?
ACK is not willing to help the renegade community nor participate with any parts of it. He just cares about himself and thinks hes always doing the right thing. What good is he doing here? Thats what you have to ask not is he annoying, retarded and fucked up. If he wants to be that way let him. Why keep him around though if he won't contribute?
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151254] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 17:45 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
So I should ban everyone who doesn't contribute and is annoying? That's a whole shitload of bans.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151256] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 17:48 |
genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
Actually it wouldn't be that many if you interpretted people who contribute simply to be people who browse the forums and make some effort to help or encourage conversation.
ACK does the exact opposite. He is also considered annoying by 3/4's of the people on these forums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151258] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 17:52 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
That is farfetched to ban someone just because they don't contribute. Lots of people here haven't contributed much.
Even if topics didn't go off topic because of ACK, personally I would ban him for correcting everyone incessantly on the most insignificant things and purposely being an annoyance. After all, pretty much the only reason he comes here is to annoy people.
Am I getting through to you, Crimson, or is your mind already made up?
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151259] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 17:56 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151261] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 18:00 |
genetix
Messages: 392
Registered: July 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
To tell you the truth I don't try and start casual conversation on these forums as much as I would if he was gone. I find that he almost always interferes and disrupts things. I go on other forums for casual conversation.
I come here to keep updated in the server owners forum thats pretty much it.
Puzzle - Petals Around the Rose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151266] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 18:23 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Crimson |
And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?
|
Because he is only one out of the many people that come here. I'm not going to stop because of one annoying person.
Also, don't presume that he makes anything so horrible that I'd stop coming here. He probably thinks he's really getting to me, but the truth is that he is just a really really annoying pest. I still want to visit these forums, but I don't like hanging around somewhere where there is some 20 something year old loser who hangs around trying to piss me and others off.
If I add ACK to my ignore list, then I will have to add everyone who replies to his asshole remarks to my ignore list also.
| Quote: |
Am I getting through to you, Crimson, or is your mind already made up?
|
Answer??? Am I wasting my time talking to you or is there any hope of doing anything about ACK?
| Quote: |
Ever think as to why he does? Maybe you should think outside the box and look for the motive behind his actions rather than just his actions.
|
Hold on - There is a reason for annoying people?
LOL
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151269] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 18:29 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
OK then.
Tell me: What is ACK's reason for coming here to annoy people?
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
