|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151176] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 11:20   |
 |
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
Suspension is what i would like to happen.
Standards would have to be set, such as:
5 days for a bear skin picture... etc etc
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151177] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 11:24 |
 |
Hav0c
Messages: 305
Registered: August 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Quote: |
Remember, it's before, not b4.
Remember, it's I, not i.
Remember, it's meantime, not mean time.
Remember, it's don't, not dont.
Remember, it's a while, not awhile.
Remember, it's God, not god.
Remember, it's because, not cuz.
Remember, it's sweating, not sweatin.
Remember, it's telling, not tellen.
Remember, it's fuck, not f*ck.
Remember, it's their, not there.
Remember, it's isn't, not isnt.
|
O_o
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151179] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 11:27 |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Sir Phoenixx |
Everyone else who replied to his posts that continued the flame war (or, in some cases start it) should be banned too.
|
Nein.
I was also thinking about this. I don't see Aircraftkiller actually helping with anything anymore, all he does it try to defame Renegade and the work of BHS (keep in mind Renegade is what BHS does).
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151181] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 11:30 |
icedog90
Messages: 3483
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
|
Crimson already said she won't ban him, she said to just ignore him and then she'll actually help out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151195] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 13:18 |
 |
Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953
Registered: December 2004
Location: United States
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Aircraftkiller is very annoying. And I agree with that. But like some people say, just ignore him, completely. He has never even posted on one of my topics before...I wonder why...
David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151197] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 13:26 |
 |
Walrus
Messages: 382
Registered: February 2003
Location: Good old England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
If there is some one you don't like, just put them on the ignor list. That is why it is there...
Only you can prevent forest fires! I mean flame wars!
One Last Time
"England expects that every man will do his duty"
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151200] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 13:41 |
|
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
| egg098 |
"Fighting fire with fire creates more fire."
|
How do you think they put out oil rig fires?
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151201] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 13:43 |
Spoony_old
Messages: 1105
Registered: December 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
You know there's something seriously wrong with the quality of your life when you have nearly 5000 posts on a forum devoted to something you pretend to hate.
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151202] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 13:45 |
 |
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| icedog90 |
Crimson already said she won't ban him, she said to just ignore him and then she'll actually help out.
|
That is unfortunate. He should be banned for making so many threads spiral off topic. ...And it isn't the fault of the people replying to his posts. If he didn't make asshole remarks and correct everyone on everything, then MANY more topics would stay on track.
Like I said before, these forums are becoming a joke simply because of the sheer volume of threads that go off topic because of him.
It is sad to think that he is a total nuisance, that many people want hime gone and yet at the same time, it is already decided that he is not going to be banned. That is like giving him permission to do whatever he wants.
If it was up to me, I would opt to preserve the quality of these forums rather than keep him around.
:rolleyes:
As for the ignore feature, it isn't going to be any use untill almost everyone ignores him. I have him ignored already, and others do to, but threads still go off topic because of his posts.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151210] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 14:26 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
...Therefore we remove the annoyance and there will be no fight.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should ACK be banned? [message #151212] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 14:33 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
If there was a thorn in my ass, I wouldn't ignore it and pretend that it wasn't annoying...I would get rid of it.
I don't read your posts and then cry and sulk over them. I'm not emotionally effected in any way. But an annoyance is an annoyance, and it should be dealt with.
| Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
) posts in turns into a flame war,
