Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » How did this get passed?
How did this get passed? [message #148544] Fri, 08 April 2005 18:17 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
General (1 Star)
IRON FART

Bacteria only need to survive antibiotics like that once to build up a resistance. Once they have a resistance, any bacteria that form from them will have that resistance, and any bacteria so much as touching the resistant bacteria will become resistant. This story applies to malaria drugs in Africa. People are so afraid of getting malaria, that they take the drugs, even on false alarms, and build a resistance.

America is not a christian country, so kids shouldn't be taught like it is one. Schools should not hang on to old religious value as a basis not to teach evolution or make up the lame excuse that people are offended by it because of their religion.


Isn't malaria caused by a dinoflagellate protist? I thought antibiotics didn't work on those. Or are you saying that the people think it might work, and thus try to use it.

My thoughts on religion in schools:

I believe schools should teach the major topics of important world religions like Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Because religion has, throughout history, been a major factor in shaping the world. Doitle, I really don't believe that you've never been taught anything of Christianity in school. I've had 2 or something less years of schooling than you have, and I have been taught the major points of Christianity, along with Hindusim, Buddhism, Daoism, Shintoism, Judaism, Islam, and a couple others.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Terri Shiavo
Next Topic: Tribute to Terry Shiavo
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Feb 19 01:12:15 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01279 seconds