Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » How did this get passed?
How did this get passed? [message #148328] Thu, 07 April 2005 13:52 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
General (1 Star)
Aircraftkiller

Lets not, because Hitler was a liberal by today's definition of the word and he espoused liberal idealogy. His regime was almost identical to commuism, and I know many people just like you would have been singing his praise today had he kept Europe.


[a] So what? He believed in progressive policy.

[b] No, I really wouldn't be supporting Hitler if he were in office today and carrying out atrocities. Although, before Hitler went nuts and started killing non-Aryans, the entire world believed he was going to be one of the greatest leaders Germany had ever had. Somewhere between 1929 and 1935, I think, Hitler was Time's Man of the Year. If Hitler hadn't been a loon, he could have been one of the more positively distinguished leaders of the 20th Century.

ACK

It doesn't matter if they were anti-communist because they had the SAME BELIEFS. The same worker's paradise, the same social programs, the same system of denying your rights in the interest of the common good.


But it does matter that they were anti-communist. That's the point I was making. The current neo-conservatives are radically anti-liberal, but they don't exactly follow conservative policies. Just like fascism. The only area they retain "traditional" values is in things such as condemning homos and bombing abortion clinics.

ACK

Just like you would have others do to this nation. STFU you fucking retard.


I thought I had you in the crushing grip of inevitable reason, until I read this line. I have now realized I must yield to your strong, uninformed opinions and rude, childish behavior.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Terri Shiavo
Next Topic: Tribute to Terry Shiavo
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Feb 19 01:32:59 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01617 seconds