Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Survival kits?
Survival kits? [message #134302] Tue, 25 January 2005 08:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

=[DT

=gbull=[L]=]big joe didnt admit a single thing there.


He said you went there to liberate the people as one of your objectives. You liberated that nation by overthrowing the recognized and standing sovreign government. That is a Coup D'etats. They are illegal.



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134321] Tue, 25 January 2005 10:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
by that definition, are you saying revolution is against the "law" of the world? Or is that just a UN thing?

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Survival kits? [message #134323] Tue, 25 January 2005 10:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

It is against American law as well as U.N. law. I would bet that in most if not all nations it would be against the law to overthrow the government by illegitimate means.


http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134328] Tue, 25 January 2005 11:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bigejoe14 is currently offline  bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

He said you went there to liberate the people as one of your objectives. You liberated that nation by overthrowing the recognized and standing sovreign government. That is a Coup D'etats. They are illegal.

So you're in favor of someone who killed and raped his own people for pleasure?
Re: Survival kits? [message #134330] Tue, 25 January 2005 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dave Mason is currently offline  Dave Mason
Messages: 2357
Registered: April 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Aircraftkiller

Tent



Aircraftkiller

This is what I have ready in case of nuclear attack


Very Happy


www.myspace.com/midas
Survival kits? [message #134332] Tue, 25 January 2005 12:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

bigejoe14

Quote:

He said you went there to liberate the people as one of your objectives. You liberated that nation by overthrowing the recognized and standing sovreign government. That is a Coup D'etats. They are illegal.

So you're in favor of someone who killed and raped his own people for pleasure?


Of course not. Legality and morality are two completely different issues. What is moral might not necessarily be legal. And vise versa.



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134350] Tue, 25 January 2005 14:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rm5248 is currently offline  rm5248
Messages: 1156
Registered: November 2003
Location: USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Javaxcx

It is against American law as well as U.N. law. I would bet that in most if not all nations it would be against the law to overthrow the government by illegitimate means.


But the problem with this law is that the government can't enforce it if they have been taken over. Wink


w00t?
Survival kits? [message #134394] Tue, 25 January 2005 17:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
We went to war for three reasons, see hydras post of the reasons cuz im too damn tired of bringing them back up.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Survival kits? [message #134405] Tue, 25 January 2005 18:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
Javaxcx

bigejoe14

Quote:

He said you went there to liberate the people as one of your objectives. You liberated that nation by overthrowing the recognized and standing sovreign government. That is a Coup D'etats. They are illegal.

So you're in favor of someone who killed and raped his own people for pleasure?


Of course not. Legality and morality are two completely different issues. What is moral might not necessarily be legal. And vise versa.


Your legal argument is bullshit. We do not have to adhere to UN "laws," International law is mostly, if not totally, a simple choice of following or not. There are not often any consequences. The entire concept of the UN is flawed, the nations in it will not answers to themselves when they break one of these so-called "laws," the only laws that matter are the ones we have for our own nation... and we didn't break them.

Deal with it, and find a real argument.
Survival kits? [message #134406] Tue, 25 January 2005 18:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

That's a dead end argument. You signed the Charter saying what you would and wouldn't do. Whether you like it or not, that Charter is a law recognized and ratified by many nations to keep relations peaceful BETWEEN nations.

The irony here is that by not adhering to said Charter, you would be violating contract laws that your own country has in place. So any way you cut it in trying to negate the validity of the law that YOU HELPED CREATE will still result with you in the wrong.

You may be lucky enough not to be punished for your crime. And so may France, Germany, and Russia. But the crime is still a crime nonetheless.



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134408] Tue, 25 January 2005 18:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
It's not a law. Nations cannot answer to other nations, because then they lose their individual power. Nowhere in the UN charter does it say that we cannot go to war if we feel we need to, which is outlined in the framework of this nation - the leaders are to protect America and American interests and we do not need permission from anyone to do it. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed the UN charter if it took military power from us.

A crime is a crime, you're right... But this isn't a crime, you're just pulling arguments out of your ass. That ought to be illegal, you criminal. Razz
Survival kits? [message #134412] Tue, 25 January 2005 18:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Aircraftkiller

It's not a law. Nations cannot answer to other nations, because then they lose their individual power.


Wrong! Any nation can choose to leave the U.N. at any time and go on their little wars however they want to "legally." You WILLINGLY gave up your legal power to unilaterally (not true for this specific case as there was mroe than just America who invaded) invade another country. Don't like it? Pay your dues that you haven't bothered to pay, and leave.

But let's play your game for a moment. It's not a law-- but wait. Then what does that signature mean saying you'll play by those rules? Hmm... A formal contract? I'm pretty sure it's against you own law to violate a contract. That's not pulling an argument out of my ass, that's appling your own laws (like you seem to be intent on doing) on the international playground [which, back in reality, legally you cannot]).

Quote:

Nowhere in the UN charter does it say that we cannot go to war if we feel we need to, which is outlined in the framework of this nation - the leaders are to protect America and American interests and we do not need permission from anyone to do it. Otherwise we wouldn't have signed the UN charter if it took military power from us.


Wrong again! Chapter 1 and Chapter 7 of the Charter outline you cannot do this. However, chapter 7 outlines a justification for doing this. Just FYI, Iraq didn't meet those conditions-- not even remotely.

Quote:

A crime is a crime, you're right... But this isn't a crime,


Except you can't prove it Razz



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134415] Tue, 25 January 2005 18:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Oh yeah, and one other thing... check this out.

http://www.un.org/law/ilc/

Take a hard look at the members. You might be pleasently surprised.



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134419] Tue, 25 January 2005 19:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
1. Something can be illegal, and have no action taken. That is called forgiveness. It in not that it is a legal action (it's still illegal), it's just that no action has been taken.

2. The UN is not a nation, therefor your idea of nations answering to other nations is flawed.

3. Those are hypocritical arguements anyways. "Iraq is bad because they didn't listen to the UN! Invade Them!" followed immediatly by, "The UN is flawed, and no one has to listen to what they say. The only law that matters is a nation's own law." Oh... then concluded with, "Except Iraq. We say they have to listen, because it gives us a reason to invade them!"
Survival kits? [message #134441] Wed, 26 January 2005 00:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
It's a body of nations. It still means the same thing I was talking about, don't play semantics with this. :rolleyes:

There was nothing illegal about the war.
Survival kits? [message #134456] Wed, 26 January 2005 04:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
imperfect3D is currently offline  imperfect3D
Messages: 17
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
Blazer

Aircraftkiller


No, it's for sexual matters. One can't seriously go about fucking people and not need some kind of sexual stimulation. It keeps a man from going insane. The cahones are also very useful during masturbation and sperm casting, so they're going to be necessary for a survival kit... At least for people of my sexual orientation. I told you guys I'm a bitch, cahones are something important that I need in my sweaty palm. They collect and store energy, and release it when called to do so.



Laughing


I sprayed hot coffee out of my nose on that one. Thnx Blazer. :sly:
Survival kits? [message #134461] Wed, 26 January 2005 05:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Aircraftkiller

It's a body of nations. It still means the same thing I was talking about...


No it doesn't. Laughing



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134470] Wed, 26 January 2005 07:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
I believe the main purpose for the UN is combat any non-UN nations from attacking a UN nation. It did its job in Afghanistan, now leave us alone in Iraq, its non of there business unless they are willing to help. I dont know the UN charter, im just saying thats how is should be in my eyes.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Survival kits? [message #134479] Wed, 26 January 2005 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

The "main purpose" of the U.N. isn't only to protect member states from non-member states, it's to protect member states from OTHER member states. Iraq was a member state, and so is Afghanistan.

That is why it was legal for member states to participate in the Gulf War, because a member was being attacked by another member and the Security Council deemed the situation in violation of international law. Member states were then authorized to aid Kuwait in removing Iraq from their nation. You'll notice if you ever read the actual official documents that your authorization in Kuwait was limitted to removing Iraq from it and not pummelling Hussien into the ground in his own turf.



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134500] Wed, 26 January 2005 13:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rm5248 is currently offline  rm5248
Messages: 1156
Registered: November 2003
Location: USA
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Nobody enforces the damn law, so we can do pretty much whatever the fuck we want. That doesn't make it right though. Or legal.

w00t?
Survival kits? [message #134502] Wed, 26 January 2005 13:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

The "rightness" of the (any)action is nonconsequentialist as far as I'm concerned.

This means, essentially, that the rightness of the action depends on more than the ends which come about. Sure, breaking the law to some is "wrong", but in the longer run the rightness of the action (at least theoretically at this point) outweighs the "wrongness" of breaking the law.

But you are right, it DOESN'T make it legal.



http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
Survival kits? [message #134510] Wed, 26 January 2005 15:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
Javaxcx

The "main purpose" of the U.N. isn't only to protect member states from non-member states, it's to protect member states from OTHER member states. Iraq was a member state, and so is Afghanistan.


Actually, they are:

to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,


I'm the bawss.
Survival kits? [message #134522] Wed, 26 January 2005 16:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OnfireUK is currently offline  OnfireUK
Messages: 144
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
What about a book to read in case you get bored like...

erm i dunno Harry Potter Razz


Moderator @ Dethserv2: Moonlightshakers
WOL Nick : PHxOnfire
"Oh mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?" - Adam Weishaupt
"Sapere Aude- Dare to be wise"
Http://www.hyousaf.plus.com/WinDoze.gif
Survival kits? [message #134568] Wed, 26 January 2005 21:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
notice i said:

gbull

I dont know the UN charter, im just saying thats how is should be in my eyes.


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Survival kits? [message #134938] Sat, 29 January 2005 02:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
The UN deemed it illegal? Lets check the facts, shall we?
Lets look at resolution 1441, I'll take excerpts to prove to
you its legality.

Quote from 1441:"Recognizing the threat Iraq's noncompliance
with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to
international peace and security,"

Quote from 1441:"Deploring the fact that Iraq has not
provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure,
as required by resolution 687 (1991), of all aspects of its
programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and
ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and
fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons, their
components and production facilities and locations, as well
as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it
claims are for purposes not related to
nuclear-weapons-usable material,'

Quote from 1441:"Deploring further that Iraq repeatedly
obstructed immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access
to sites designated by the United Nations Special Commission
(UNSCOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
failed to cooperate fully and unconditionally with UNSCOM
and IAEA weapons inspectors, as required by resolution 687
(1991), and ultimately ceased all cooperation with UNSCOM
and the IAEA in 1998,"

Quote from 1441:"Deploring also that the Government of Iraq
has failed to comply with its commitments pursuant to
resolution 687 (1991) with regard to terrorism, pursuant to
resolution 688 (1991) to end repression of its civilian
population and to provide access by international
humanitarian organizations to all those in need of
assistance in Iraq, and pursuant to resolutions 686 (1991),
687 (1991), and 1284 (1999) to return or cooperate in
accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals
wrongfully detained by Iraq, or to return Kuwaiti property
wrongfully seized by Iraq,"

Quote from 1441:"Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991)
the Council declared that a ceasefire would be based on
acceptance by Iraq of the provisions of that resolution,
including the obligations on Iraq contained therein,"
(translation for this one: Saddam broke the fucking Persian
Gulf Peace treaty)

Quote from 1441:"4. Decides that false statements or
omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to
this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply
with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this
resolution shall constitute a further material breach of
Iraq's obligations and will be reported to the Council for
assessment in accordance with paragraphs 11 and or 12 below;

11. Directs the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the
Director General of the IAEA to report immediately to the
Council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities,
as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its
disarmament obligations, including its obligations regarding
inspections under this resolution;

12. Decides to convene immediately upon receipt of a report
in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 11 above, in order to
consider the situation and the need for full compliance with
all of the relevant Council resolutions in order to secure
international peace and security;

13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has
repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious
consequences as a result of its continued violations of its
obligations;"
Previous Topic: What the "left" thinks of the "red states&quo
Next Topic: Another debate
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 25 21:48:25 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02117 seconds