|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134365] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 15:20 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I'm not of a skill level in equality with the author of this site to argue his point, so I suppose I must concede.
What I would like to know is, if these documents are apparently false, then why did so many people come out saying they were false because of Superscript, which is obviously not the case?
Oh, and my dad thinks that if these documents were indeed fakes, chances are Karl Rove planted them. Because Karl Rove really is that tricky.
Next time, please, just summarize sites like this. Stuff like this is really too long to read in a timely manner.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134368] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 15:35 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Oh, shut up.
By the way, your "blog" isn't funny at all.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134374] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 16:16 |
|
cowmisfit
Messages: 2035 Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
SuperFlyingEngi | Oh, shut up.
By the way, your "blog" isn't funny at all.
|
lol shut up hahahah thats great.
By the way, i started that blog a full 2 days ago, as you can so clearly tell i've had plenty of time to post shit that may be slightly funny. And i wouldn't expect someone of your intellegence to find it funny at all, your one of those REALLY nerdy type people not just a normal nerd like me, your one of thsoe that never laughs i'd bet, you take EVERYTHING seriously, and basicly a dick to be around.
Okay enough pounding your sole for now.
Quote: | At my school there is 5 - 10 of these "goths" (The only goths I've probebly ever seen that attend church every sunday
|
Thats funny bitch, o ya its funny (I don't care if teh net people think its funny at all, i type shit i think my freinds would think is funny, now shut up tool.
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134382] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 16:31 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989 Registered: September 2003 Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Quote: |
Your dad is a moron, stop listeing to him , he's brain washing you to be a failer and laughing stock of all normal minded people everywere.
|
Leave personal insults out of it.
Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134383] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 16:32 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
cow, I spend 4-5 hours a week making independent films with my friends solely intent on being "funny."
Saying I never laugh is a bit of a misunderestimation.
But let's stop poking fun [pun intended] at our personal lives.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134417] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 19:06 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
cowmisfit, only on rare occasions do I ever have a word with my dad, that's on IRC, and it's when I'm talking to someone actually capable of thought-provoking ideas, namely Crimson and about 1-2 other people. No, not you.
gbull - Karl Rove once planted a spy microphone in his own office and then "discovered" it and claled the police, trying to get his opponent in trouble. In one of the few cases of his career, got caught red-handed and lost his candidate's election.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134422] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 20:22 |
|
IRON FART
Messages: 1989 Registered: September 2003 Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Quote: |
Its not an insult if its true.
|
It can be interpreted as insulting. In this case its insulting anyway you look at it because its your opinion. Moron, brought up to be a faliure, and normal minded......You have your own definitions for each of those.
I'm hijacking another thread! Yay!
Quote: |
Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134426] |
Tue, 25 January 2005 21:05 |
|
Hydra
Messages: 827 Registered: September 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
SuperFlyingEngi | I'm not of a skill level in equality with the author of this site to argue his point, so I suppose I must concede.
|
Owned.
Quote: | Oh, and my dad thinks that if these documents were indeed fakes, chances are Karl Rove planted them. Because Karl Rove really is that tricky.
|
Your dad needs to come to terms with reality; I see where you get your blind, intense hatred for George W. Bush and his administration.
You just can't accept the fact a Democrat forged those documents in an effort to hurt George W. Bush's record, can you?
cowmisfit | Your dad is a moron, stop listeing to him , he's brain washing you to be a failer and laughing stock of all normal minded people everywere.
|
I'm sure his father isn't a moron; he just has a serious lack of common sense (as most Democrats seem to have).
Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
(<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
(<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134507] |
Wed, 26 January 2005 15:01 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Tell me, hydra, what would you have me do in this position? I could no longer defend my case, so I yielded the high ground. Isn't that exactly what you claim I'm incapable of doing, seeing another person's standpoint?
And hydra, what reason is there to believe that a Democrat forged these documents over Karl Rove? Let me tell you my point of view. Rove actually has a track record of doing things like this. Like the time he put a bug in his own office and called the police, trying to blame the other candidate.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134560] |
Wed, 26 January 2005 19:58 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
If it's the truth, then prove it.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134667] |
Thu, 27 January 2005 14:43 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Hee hee.
I actually think that passage of the Star Spangled Banner symbolizes how America will recover no matter what economic horrors George Bush wreaks upon it.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To: SuperFlyingEngi - Please refute this [message #134711] |
Thu, 27 January 2005 18:15 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
About this forum | Try to avoid name calling. If you believe in your stance and what you're saying enough, you should be able to state it without personal insults...
...Though these forums, and also the internet, do not guarantee you freedom of speech, American or not, you will pretty much have it in here, so long as it's not abused. You will be contacted privately if you get out of hand.
|
Crimson, might I suggest enforcement? cowmisfit can barely go a single post without getting crude and slanderous.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|