| Mapping debate [message #123112] |
Tue, 30 November 2004 10:35  |
 |
Spice
Messages: 1448
Registered: November 2003
Location: Ohio
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Why is titans work crap? Out of all the renegade mappers he makes the most detailed levels with excellent gameplay. Which is what really matters in any map.
His Cairo map deffinitlly takes the cake when it comes to looks and the gmaeplay isn't bad either.
I would hardly call his work , Crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mapping debate [message #123188] |
Tue, 30 November 2004 16:27  |
 |
Pendullum
Messages: 255
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
its better your maps with a big field with trees everywhere... oh and the hill, christ I nearly forgot the hill!
| Aircraftkiller |
(flaming is what homosexuals do)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mapping debate [message #123201] |
Tue, 30 November 2004 16:51 |
|
Pendullum
Messages: 255
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
yeah, open fields with no real detail...
| Aircraftkiller |
(flaming is what homosexuals do)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mapping debate [message #123214] |
Tue, 30 November 2004 17:25 |
|
Pendullum
Messages: 255
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
yeah, but open fields with no tactical way of eliminating the enemy, its all open, most of the time you can b2b (taking golf course as the example there) and they're so big, its just plain boring to get between the bases, at least Ciro looks good, giving you something to look at while your getting between the bases.
| Aircraftkiller |
(flaming is what homosexuals do)
|
|
|
|
|
| Mapping debate [message #123263] |
Tue, 30 November 2004 18:24 |
sfr3f
Messages: 33
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Golf isn't a RenAlert map. "b2b" is a thing of Renegade.
Open fields?
Open: Having no protecting or concealing cover, affording unobstructed passage or view.
Field: A broad, level, open expanse of land.
NOT AN OPEN FIELD.
If the terrain needs big freaking canyon walls to define "tactical" avenues, you've got to be plum retarded. Maps without restrictive terrain (canyons) are so much more tacticaly diverse. LOS shadows behind hills are good for ambush or hiding. High points give beter range of sight and are harder to attack head on. Trees and brush give cover to infantry, and even armor. Valleys can hide an aproaching armor column.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mapping debate [message #123450] |
Wed, 01 December 2004 16:36 |
|
Pendullum
Messages: 255
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
and you do the same
| Aircraftkiller |
(flaming is what homosexuals do)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mapping debate [message #123492] |
Wed, 01 December 2004 18:59 |
 |
Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
| Pendullum |
and you do the same
|
And I do what, Pendumbass? What kind of point were you trying to cough up this time? At least label what you think lest my opinion of your brainless antics continue to propagate...
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
