Arming a beacon with a Stealth Black Hand doesn't expose him [message #101776] |
Thu, 15 July 2004 18:35 ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
flyingfox
Messages: 1612 Registered: February 2003 Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Sometimes when ^^ lays a beacon, he keeps his stealth throughout, when it should expose him and re-stealth him after 5 seconds when the beacon is finished arming. It's a relatively small error, and I'm unsure if it happens only when Nod players are looking at him (because y'know, when did you last come across a stealthed soldier laying a beacon?).
In case you say it, it never appears to you that you've kept your stealth. But I watch them lay beacons and their suits don't uncover. Maybe just a client side error that tells you wrongly that they didn't uncover.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arming a beacon with a Stealth Black Hand doesn't expose him [message #102362] |
Sun, 18 July 2004 07:18 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
Weirdo
Messages: 369 Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
I also found this out for myself yesterday. On field (AGT was down), a SBH tryed to place a beacon behind our bar. I saw him running there, but just let him deploy for the points. When I got behind the bar, I saw the beacon, being placed, but I didn't immediatly see the SBH.
Untill yesterday I always thought SBH's uncloack when placing a beacon (kind of sad playing this game from the beginning but just now discovering this).
Size doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|