Differences between the Best Class of Infantry? [message #-980956] |
Mon, 18 February 2002 12:38 |
|
We know the differences between a flamthrower trooper and a Grenadethrower troopers, or the differences between a grunt and a black hand. But what about the fourth class of infantry? Even though their weapons look different and THE WAY their fire LOOKS different, they seem pretty much the same. Both Havoc and Sakruya use sniper rifles while Sydney and....ueh, what's his name again both use a long range, but slow ROF weapon (personal ion cannon and the rail gun). Dr.Mobius and......don't know his name either uses similar weapons also. So they are pretty much the same, aren't they?
|
|
|
|
Differences between the Best Class of Infantry? [message #-980954] |
Mon, 18 February 2002 13:06 |
|
What the hell are you talking about? Mobius\Mendoza: Medium range Anti-tank\Anti-Infantry Sydney PBA\Raveshaw: Long range Anti-tank\Moderate Anti-Infantry Havoc\Sakura: Extreme range Anti-Infantry Sheesh, they aren't the same. What the hell are you people thinking?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between the Best Class of Infantry? [message #-980950] |
Mon, 18 February 2002 19:41 |
|
Hitmanultra, in answer to your question; They are the same. Havoc and Sakura use the same Ramjet Rifle. Mobieus and Mendosa use the same volt gun. Only Sydney PBA and Raveshaw use different weapons. Sydney has the portable ion cannon while Raveshaw has the railgun. Both weapons have identical use and affect though. I don't really see why they chose to make them the same as their counterparts since the vehicles are so vastly different on both sides.
|
|
|
|