| Nuke on harvester could work... [message #-976810] |
Fri, 29 March 2002 12:00  |
|
|
|
In the map "Under" it might been possible to Place a nuke on the GDI harvester, as it passes the high cliff to reach the tiberium, a Nod guy could be sitting up there in a NOD buggy and he could drive out to the edge, before landing he could jump out of the Buggy and land on the harvester, place the nuke on the top of it and if the ATV is destroyed... Well then u got another way to sneak into theire base on the harvesters roof! PS: I have NEVER tryed this before but it gotta work!
|
|
|
|
| Nuke on harvester could work... [message #-976809] |
Fri, 29 March 2002 12:11  |
|
|
There's two reasons why that won't won't.
Tried riding on top of enemy vehicle - (once I was on top had buddy drive to see if it would work) - as soon as the vehicle moved, I was killed. As for the planting a beacon on the harvester or one of your own vehicles, I did this to an APC and drove off - beacon just stayed suspended in mid-air.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nuke on harvester could work... [message #-976806] |
Fri, 29 March 2002 21:09 |
|
|
|
ok...math lesson. enemy harvester + you as soldier in path of or on top of = boink. Or This is you. This is you on the enemy harvester. BOINK. Any questions? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to beable to ride on top enemy vehicle right into their base, think it'd be funny as he!! - specially if tank was low on health and obelisk mistook for enemy because of my presence and blasted it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nuke on harvester could work... [message #-976804] |
Fri, 29 March 2002 23:10 |
|
|
i thought abaout it!
in maps like walls u can get quite good upon a vehicle! i tryed it, the beacon really stays where it was planted! so this tactic is useless!
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
