| the obliskes [message #-975725] |
Fri, 05 April 2002 16:31  |
|
|
the oblisk is too strong...expecialy with the turrents[but hay those can be taken out easaly IF THAT OBLISK ISNT THERE!] 
|
|
|
|
| the obliskes [message #-975724] |
Fri, 05 April 2002 22:32  |
|
|
|
Your kidding, right? the turrets are usually taken out first - because there is no warning that there under attack. as for the obi - apv rush with hotwires usually works. or a couple of mamies with mlrs support can take it. but you will die - so dont back out....
|
|
|
|
| the obliskes [message #-975723] |
Sat, 06 April 2002 04:07 |
|
|
|
WW needs to add a "Nod turrets under attack" message because the turrets are a good apc defense
|
|
|
|
| the obliskes [message #-975722] |
Sat, 06 April 2002 06:54 |
|
|
|
the oblisk is too powerfull it needs like a shorter range or somthing...and the turrens ne to be like gun emplacements or somthing...one more thing... iv noticed when dong a GDI tank rush the oblisk power varys...like one time i was driving a mammoth tank and this other guy was draving a med tank and the oblisk shot the med tank,took out his shelds,and the oblisk killed me one HIT!!! like WW needs to stop puting a random power in sertain defense structures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| the obliskes [message #-975719] |
Sat, 06 April 2002 10:32 |
|
|
it is most likely that becuase mamotsh are slolier they are hurt more than mdium tank becasue it can avoid part of the beam
if you sit in a veicle it wil be hurt more than if you are advancing
|
|
|
|
| the obliskes [message #-975718] |
Sat, 06 April 2002 11:12 |
|
|
lol t so soooo much easier to rush the obelisk than the AGT 
It can only shoot one at a time!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| the obliskes [message #-975716] |
Sat, 06 April 2002 16:33 |
|
|
|
You are both right. Figure it out. It's one vehicle at a time, so know that you will need three to deal with it. The AGT does a great job at wounding anything that comes near it and it doesn't have to power up, so it will keep attacking whatever comes toward it. Personally, I'd rather defend an AGT than an OB.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
